Dimensionless Index in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Alexandre Altes1, Nicolas Thellier1,2, Dan Rusinaru2,3

  • 1Université Lille Nord de France, GCS-Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Laboratoire d'échocardiographie, Service de Cardiologie Nord, Centre des Valvulopathies, Faculté de Médecine et de Maïeutique, Université Catholique de Lille, France (A.A., N.T., W.M., B.L., P.P., S.M.).

Insights

The dimensionless index (DI) helps identify high-risk patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) and low flow. A DI below 0.25 indicates increased mortality risk in this subgroup, suggesting potential benefit from aortic valve replacement.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Echocardiography
  • Clinical Risk Stratification

Background:

  • Risk stratification for low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved ejection fraction is challenging.
  • The dimensionless index (DI), a ratio of left ventricular outflow tract to aortic valve jet velocity integrals, requires evaluation for prognostic value.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the relationship between the dimensionless index (DI) and mortality in patients with LG severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
  • To determine if DI can identify high-risk subgroups within this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Studied 755 patients with LG severe AS (aortic valve area ≤1 cm²/indexed ≤0.6 cm²/m², mean gradient <40 mmHg) and preserved ejection fraction (≥50%).
  • Classified patients into low flow (LF, stroke volume index <35 mL/m²) and normal flow (NF, ≥35 mL/m²) groups.
  • Analyzed mortality risk associated with DI <0.25 versus DI ≥0.25, adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic variables.

Main Results:

  • Patients with LG-LF severe AS and DI <0.25 had significantly increased mortality risk (adjusted HR, 2.41) compared to LG-NF with DI ≥0.25.
  • A DI <0.25 provided incremental prognostic value specifically in the LG-LF subgroup, not in the LG-NF group.
  • Other combinations of flow status and DI did not show significant differences in outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • In LG severe AS with preserved ejection fraction, a DI <0.25 is a reliable indicator of increased mortality risk in patients with low flow.
  • This finding identifies a high-risk subgroup likely to benefit from aortic valve replacement.

Related Concept Videos

Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests01:23

Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

Mitral stenosis is a heart condition in which the mitral valve, which allows blood to flow from the left atrium to the left ventricle, becomes narrowed or stenotic. This narrowing hinders blood flow and leads to clinical symptoms requiring specific medical evaluations and management strategies. The following overview outlines the clinical symptoms, assessments, diagnostic findings, prevention methods, and treatments for mitral stenosis.Clinical ManifestationsDyspnea (shortness of breath): This...
117
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management01:27

Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

A comprehensive nursing assessment is essential for patients with valvular heart disease, which involves any dysfunction of the heart valves that could impact blood flow and overall heart function.Subjective Data Collection:Chief Complaint and Present Illness: Start with the patient's primary concerns, focusing on the onset, duration, and progression of cardiac symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain, and palpitations.Past Medical History: Collect detailed information on any previous...
175
Heart Failure V: Medical Management01:30

Heart Failure V: Medical Management

Medical Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)The primary goals of therapy for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) include:Relieving symptomsOptimizing volume statusSupporting oxygenation and ventilationMaintaining cardiac output (CO) and end-organ perfusionIdentifying and addressing the cause of ADHFPreventing complicationsProviding patient education on factors precipitating HF exacerbationPlanning for dischargeOngoing monitoring and assessment...
119
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
182