Clinical Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum Cleaner Effect or with a Vacuum-Assisted Access...

To compare outcomes of two different miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques: minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) with the vacuum cleaner effect and vacuum-assisted mini-PCNL (vmPCNL). Data from 104 (66.7%) patients who underwent vmPCNL and 52 (33.3%) patients who underwent MIP at a single tertiary referral academic center between January 2016 and December 2019 were analyzed. Patient demographics and peri- and postoperative data were recorded, and propensity score matching was performed. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to identify variables associated with operative time (OT) and patient effective dose. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with infectious complications and stone-free (SF) status. Patient demographics and stone characteristics were comparable between groups. vmPCNL was associated with shorter OT (p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time, and patient effective dose (4.2 mSv vs 7.9 mSv; p < 0.001). A higher rate of infectious complications was found in the MIP group (25.0% vs 7.7%, p < 0.01). Linear regression analysis showed that stone volume, multiple stones, and MIP procedure (all p values ≤0.02) were associated with longer OT. Similarly, OT and the MIP procedure (p ≤ 0.02) were associated with higher patient effective dose. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the stone volume, positive preoperative bladder urine culture, and MIP procedure (all p values ≤0.02) were associated with postoperative infectious complications. vmPCNL was not associated with the SF rate. Mini-PCNL performed with continuous active suction is associated with lower rates of infectious complications, shorter OT, and lower patient effective dose than MIP.