Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
Sex differences in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
Hao Lei1, Jiahui Hu1, Leiling Liu1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Insights
This meta-analysis found that females experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have lower survival rates and poorer neurological outcomes compared to males. These sex differences in OHCA prognosis warrant further investigation into underlying causes and treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a significant global cause of sudden cardiac death.
- Existing research indicates sex-based pathophysiological and clinical differences in OHCA, yet consensus on survival and prognosis disparities remains elusive.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between sex factors and prognosis in patients with OHCA.
- To clarify existing discrepancies in the literature regarding sex differences in OHCA outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.
- 33 studies involving 1,268,664 patients were included, with pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated using a random-effects model.
Main Results:
- Females with OHCA were older and more likely to experience unwitnessed arrests compared to males.
- While survival to hospital admission showed no significant sex difference, females had significantly lower survival rates from hospital admission to discharge (OR 0.59) and poorer neurological outcomes (OR 0.62).
Conclusions:
- Females with OHCA exhibit lower overall survival and neurological prognosis compared to males.
- Potential contributing factors include female pathophysiological characteristics, more conservative treatment approaches, and variations in post-resuscitation care.
- Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to potential confounding factors in the included studies.
Background:
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death worldwide. Researchers have found significant pathophysiological differences between females and males and clinically significant sex differences related to medical services. However, conflicting results exist and there is no uniform agreement regarding sex differences in survival and prognosis after OHCA. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the prognosis of OHCA and sex factors.
Methods:
We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and obtained a total of 1042 articles, from which 33 studies were selected for inclusion. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model.
Results:
The meta-analysis included 1,268,664 patients. Compared with males, females were older (69.7 years vs. 65.4 years, p < 0.05) and more frequently suffered OHCA without witnesses (58.39% vs 62.70%, p < 0.05). Females were less likely to receive in-hospital interventions than males. There was no significant difference between females and males in the survival from OHCA to hospital admission (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89-1.1). However, females had lower chances for survival from hospital admission to discharge (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48-0.73), overall survival to hospital discharge (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86), and favorable neurological outcomes (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.83) compared with males.
Conclusions:
Our results indicate that the overall discharge survival rate of females is lower than that of males, and females face a poor prognosis of the nervous system. This is likely related to the pathophysiological characteristics of females, more conservative treatment measures compared with males, and different post-resuscitation care. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the presence of several confounding factors.
More Related Videos
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
05:36Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use