Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026
System for Efficacy and Cytotoxicity Screening of Inhibitors Targeting Intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published on: April 5, 2017
Evaluation of factors influencing Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex recovery and contamination rates in MGIT960
Kalaiarasan Ellappan1, Suvrankar Datta2, Muthaiah Muthuraj3
1Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India.
Background:
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem worldwide. Contamination rate and poor recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in MGIT960 culture may affect the early diagnosis of TB. Evidence is needed to determine the factors associated with contamination rates and MTBC recovery in MGIT960. Hence, we undertook this study to compare the factors influencing MTBC culture positivity and contamination rates in MGIT960 in patients with Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).
Methods:
A total of 849 sputum samples from newly diagnosed smear-positive TB cases enrolled into the Regional Prospective Observational Research for Tuberculosis India cohort between May 2014 to March 2017 were analyzed. Samples were inoculated into MGIT960 and positive cultures were examined for the presence of MTBC by immunochromatographic test for detection of MPT64 antigen.
Results:
Of the 849 cases, 811 (95.5%) were culture positive for MTBC, 23 (2.7%) were culture negative and 15 (1.8%) were contaminated. Salivary sputum showed significantly less culture yield compared to mucopurulent/blood stained samples (p = 0.021). Sputum from individuals <20 or ≥60 years showed lower culture yield of 93.9%, compared to those aged 20-59years (98.2%) (p = 0.002). Based on smear grading, culture isolation of MTBC by MGIT960 was 86.1%, 93.6% and 99.5% for negative, scanty and positive (1+/2+/3+) samples, respectively (p ≤ 0.0001). Sputum from HIV negative patients showed higher culture yield, compared to HIV positive patients (p ≤ 0.0001). Chest X-Ray revealed that patient with cavity showed higher culture isolation of MTBC compared to patients without cavity (p = 0.035). Contamination rates were higher in smear negatives (6.0%), compared to scanty (2.1%) and smear positives (1.1%) (p = 0.007). However, delay in transport of the specimen to the laboratory was the only independent factor significantly associated with increase in culture contamination.
Conclusion:
Our results highlight that extremes of age, smear negativity, HIV infection, sputum quality and cavitation significantly influence the culture yield of MTBC, whereas transport duration and smear grading affected the contamination rates in MGIT960. Hence, addressing these factors may improve the diagnostic performance of MGIT960.
