Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Comparing Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Established in Mouse Kidney and on Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane
Published on: February 8, 2020
HIF1α is not a target of 14q deletion in clear cell renal cancer
Niraj Shenoy1,2
1Department of Medicine (Oncology), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, 10461, USA. niraj.shenoy@einsteinmed.org.
Abstract:
HIF1α has been termed a tumor-suppressor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), primarily based on functional proliferation studies in cell lines (in vitro and in vivo) with genetic manipulation, and the adverse prognosis of 14q-deleted ccRCC patients. In other malignancies, however, HIF1α has an established tumor-promoting role. Therefore, this study sought to further examine the role of HIF1α in ccRCC using bioinformatic analyses of 530 ccRCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA) registries. Although lower copy numbers of HIF1A (encoding HIF1α, located at 14q23.2) was associated with worse survival, there was no survival difference based on either HIF1A mRNA or HIF1α protein expression. Interestingly, L2HGDH (L-2-Hydroxyglutarate Dehydrogenase), a recently characterized epigenetic modulating ccRCC tumor-suppressor with a marked impact on survival, was found to be located only ~ 11.5Mbp from HIF1A on 14q (at 14q21.3). L2HGDH was therefore co-deleted in ~ 95% of 14q deletions involving HIF1A locus. Remarkably, HIF1A CNV had a markedly stronger correlation with L2HGDH expression (Rho = 0.55) than its own gene expression (Rho = 0.27), indicating high preserved-allele compensation of HIF1A. Genetic loss of HIF1A was therefore associated with a much greater reduction of L2HGDH gene expression than its own gene expression, providing a possible explanation for survival differences based on HIF1A CNV and mRNA expression. Furthermore, in 14q-deleted ccRCC patients with complete (uncensored) survival data, in the relatively rare cases where genetic loss of HIF1A occurred without genetic loss of L2HGDH (n = 5), the survival was significantly greater than where there was simultaneous genetic loss of both (n = 87) (mean survival 1670.8 ± 183.5 days vs 885.1 ± 78.4 days; p = 0.007). In addition, there was no correlation between HIF1A mRNA and HIF1α protein expression in ccRCC (R = 0.02), reflecting the primarily post-translational regulation of HIF1α. Lastly, even between L2HGDH and HIF1A loci, 14q was found to have several other yet-to-be-characterized potential ccRCC tumor-suppressors. Taken together, the data indicate that HIF1α is not a target of 14q deletion in ccRCC and that it is not a tumor-suppressor in this malignancy.
Insights
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF1α) is not a tumor-suppressor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Genetic loss of HIF1A, encoding HIF1α, is linked to reduced expression of the tumor-suppressor L2HGDH, explaining survival differences in ccRCC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- HIF1α (Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha) has conflicting roles in cancer, acting as a tumor-suppressor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on cell studies, but a tumor-promoter in other cancers.
- Prognosis of ccRCC patients with 14q deletions suggests a tumor-suppressor role for genes in this region, including HIF1A.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of HIF1α in ccRCC using bioinformatic analysis of patient data.
- To clarify the association between HIF1A copy number variations (CNVs), gene expression, protein levels, and patient survival in ccRCC.
- To explore the relationship between HIF1A and L2HGDH (L-2-Hydroxyglutarate Dehydrogenase) in ccRCC, given their proximity on chromosome 14q.
Main Methods:
- Bioinformatic analysis of 530 ccRCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA).
- Analysis of HIF1A copy number, mRNA expression, and HIF1α protein levels.
- Correlation analysis between HIF1A CNV, HIF1A gene expression, L2HGDH expression, and patient survival.
- Examination of co-deletion patterns of HIF1A and L2HGDH in 14q-deleted ccRCC.
Main Results:
- Lower HIF1A copy numbers correlated with worse survival, but HIF1A mRNA or protein expression did not show survival differences.
- L2HGDH, a ccRCC tumor-suppressor, is frequently co-deleted with HIF1A on 14q.
- HIF1A CNV showed a stronger correlation with L2HGDH expression than HIF1A gene expression, suggesting allele compensation.
- Genetic loss of HIF1A significantly reduced L2HGDH expression more than HIF1A expression itself.
- Patients with 14q deletions lacking L2HGDH loss survived longer than those with simultaneous loss of both HIF1A and L2HGDH.
- No correlation was observed between HIF1A mRNA and HIF1α protein expression, indicating post-translational regulation.
Conclusions:
- HIF1α is not a target of 14q deletion in ccRCC.
- HIF1α does not function as a tumor-suppressor in ccRCC; its apparent role may be confounded by the co-deletion of L2HGDH.
- The study highlights the importance of considering co-deleted genes and copy number variations in understanding tumor suppressor roles in ccRCC.
Related Concept Videos
The Retinoblastoma Gene
The first-ever tumor suppressor gene called Rb was identified in retinoblastoma - a rare eye tumor in children. In inherited forms of the disease, a child inherits one defective copy of the Rb gene, which predisposes them to retinoblastoma. However,...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

