Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Author Correction: Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them
Neal R Haddaway1,2,3, Alison Bethel4, Lynn V Dicks5,6
1Mercator Research Institute on Climate Change and Global Commons, Berlin, Germany. neal_haddaway@hotmail.com.
Abstract:
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
More Related Videos
04:34Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Critical Thinking I