Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Quantification of Severity of Unilateral Coronal Synostosis
Sophia A J Kronig1, Otto D M Kronig1, Henri A Vrooman2,3
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 8124University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Objectives:
Severity of unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) can vary. Quantification is important for treatment, expectations of treatment and natural outcome, and education of the patient and parents.
Design:
Retrospective study.
Setting:
Primary craniofacial center.
Patients, Participants:
Twenty-three preoperative patients with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (age < 2 years).
Intervention:
Utrecht Cranial Shape Quantifier (UCSQ) was used to quantify severity using the variables: asymmetry ratio of frontal peak and ratio of frontal peak gradient.
Main Outcome Measures(S):
The UCSQ variables were combined and related to visual score using Pearson correlation coefficient; UCSQ and visual score were additionally compared to Di Rocco classification by one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test. All measurements were made on computed tomography scans.
Results:
Good correlation between UCSQ and visual score was found (r = 0.67). No statistically significant differences were found between group means of UCSQ in the 3 categories of Di Rocco classification (F2,20 = 0.047; P > .05). Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant differences between group means of visual score in the 3 categories of Di Rocco classification (Kruskal-Wallis H (2) = 0.871; P > .05).
Conclusions:
Using UCSQ, we can quantify UCS according to severity using characteristics, it outperforms traditional methods and captures the whole skull shape. In future research, we can apply UCSQ to 3D-photogrammetry due to the utilization of external landmarks.
More Related Videos
06:28Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
Published on: September 2, 2025
04:17Author Spotlight: Development and Evaluation of a Standardized Rat Model for Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...