Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BODIES: BOdy shape parameter and 3D meshes of Individuals basEd on SUPR.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Hysterectomy or not for borderline ovarian tumor in menopause?

Gynecologic oncology·2025
Same author

Enhancing Social Experiences in Immersive Virtual Reality with Artificial Facial Mimicry.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

A Semiautomated Pipeline for the Creation of Virtual Fitting Room Experiences Featuring Motion Capture and Cloth Simulation.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2025
Same author

Mammography classification with multi-view deep learning techniques: Investigating graph and transformer-based architectures.

Medical image analysis·2024
Same author

A Testbed for Studying Cybersickness and its Mitigation in Immersive Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
06:38

Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior

Published on: June 9, 2020

5.1K

An Evaluation Testbed for Locomotion in Virtual Reality.

Alberto Cannavo, Davide Calandra, F Gabriele Prattico

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
    |October 20, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Virtual Reality (VR) locomotion methods vary in cost and performance. This study introduces a testbed to objectively evaluate and compare VR locomotion techniques for diverse applications.

    More Related Videos

    The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
    08:36

    The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

    Published on: July 28, 2022

    4.2K
    Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality
    08:45

    Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality

    Published on: April 5, 2018

    7.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 5, 2025

    Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior
    06:38

    Using a Virtual Reality Walking Simulator to Investigate Pedestrian Behavior

    Published on: June 9, 2020

    5.1K
    The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
    08:36

    The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

    Published on: July 28, 2022

    4.2K
    Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality
    08:45

    Measuring the Kinematics of Daily Living Movements with Motion Capture Systems in Virtual Reality

    Published on: April 5, 2018

    7.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Virtual Reality Systems
    • Locomotion Interfaces

    Background:

    • Virtual Reality (VR) locomotion is essential for user experience.
    • Current VR locomotion methods face limitations in tracking space and cost.
    • A standardized evaluation framework for VR locomotion is lacking.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a novel evaluation testbed for VR locomotion.
    • To enable comprehensive analysis and comparison of different VR locomotion approaches.
    • To assist in selecting optimal VR locomotion techniques for specific applications.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a versatile VR locomotion evaluation testbed.
    • Proposal of an experimental protocol for objective and subjective data collection.
    • Implementation of a scoring system to rank locomotion techniques based on weighted requirements.

    Main Results:

    • The testbed facilitates a structured comparison of VR locomotion methods.
    • Objective and subjective measures provide insights into usability and performance.
    • A use case demonstrates the testbed's utility in selecting VR locomotion techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed testbed addresses the need for a standardized VR locomotion evaluation methodology.
    • This framework supports informed decision-making for VR system development and application design.
    • The scoring system aids in identifying the most suitable locomotion techniques for specific VR scenarios.