Increased Dissociation of Adamantanamines in Influenza A M2 S31N with Partial Block by Rimantadine
Kelly L McGuire1, Jonathon T Hill1, David D Busath1
1Department of Physiology and Developmental Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Abstract:
The ubiquitous mutation from serine (WT) to asparagine at residue 31 (S31N) in the influenza A M2 channel renders it insensitive to amantadine (AMT) and rimantadine (RMT) block, but it is unknown whether the inhibition results from weak binding or incomplete block. Two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) of transfected Xenopus oocytes revealed that the M2 S31N channel is essentially fully blocked by AMT at 10 mM, demonstrating that, albeit weak, AMT binding in a channel results in complete block of its proton current. In contrast, RMT achieves only a modest degree of block in the M2 S31N channel at 1 mM, with very little increase in block at 10 mM, indicating that the RMT binding site in the channel saturates with only modest block. From exponential curve fits to families of proton current wash-in and wash-out traces, the association rate constant (k1) is somewhat decreased for both AMT and RMT in the S31N, but the dissociation rate constant (k2) is dramatically increased compared with WT. The potentials of mean force (PMF) from adaptive biasing force (ABF) molecular dynamics simulations predict that rate constants should be exquisitely sensitive to the charge state of the His37 selectivity filter of M2. With one exception out of eight cases, predictions from the simulations with one and three charged side chains bracket the experimental rate constants, as expected for the acidic bath used in the TEVC assay. From simulations, the weak binding can be accounted for by changes in the potentials of mean force, but the partial block by RMT remains unexplained.
Insights
The S31N mutation in influenza A M2 channels causes amantadine (AMT) to bind weakly but completely block proton flow. Rimantadine (RMT) shows only modest block, suggesting saturation of its binding site.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Molecular Biology
- Biophysics
Background:
- Influenza A M2 channel mutations, like S31N, confer resistance to antiviral drugs amantadine (AMT) and rimantadine (RMT).
- The precise mechanism of resistance, whether due to weak binding or incomplete channel block, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the mechanism by which the S31N mutation affects amantadine and rimantadine inhibition of the influenza A M2 channel.
- To differentiate between weak binding and incomplete block as causes of drug resistance.
Main Methods:
- Two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC) electrophysiology on Xenopus oocytes expressing mutant M2 channels.
- Kinetic analysis of proton current wash-in and wash-out traces to determine rate constants (k1, k2).
- Adaptive biasing force (ABF) molecular dynamics simulations to calculate potentials of mean force (PMF).
Main Results:
- Amantadine (AMT) binding to the S31N M2 channel, though weak, results in complete block of proton current.
- Rimantadine (RMT) exhibits only modest block of the S31N M2 channel, even at high concentrations, indicating binding site saturation.
- Rate constant analysis revealed decreased association (k1) and dramatically increased dissociation (k2) for both drugs in the S31N mutant.
- Molecular dynamics simulations correlated rate constants with the charge state of the His37 residue in the M2 channel's selectivity filter.
Conclusions:
- The S31N mutation confers amantadine resistance through weak binding that still achieves complete proton channel block.
- Rimantadine resistance is characterized by binding site saturation leading to incomplete block.
- Molecular dynamics simulations support experimental findings and highlight the role of the His37 charge state in drug interactions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...
Antiasthma Drugs: Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists
Antimuscarinic agents compete with ACh for the same binding site on the muscarinic receptors. By binding to these receptors, they inhibit the downstream effects of ACh and block the parasympathetic...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Pharmacokinetics
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral...
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Release or Uptake
Preparation of 1° Amines: Hofmann and Curtius Rearrangement Overview


