Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
The magnitude of the problem of obstetric violence and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study
Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano1, Sergio Martinez-Vazquez2, Julián Rodríguez-Almagro3
1Department of Nursing of University of Jaen, Jaén, Spain; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Background:
In recent years, the concept of obstetric violence has become visible among women and professionals, but its prevalence and the factors with which it is related in our healthcare environment are unknown.
Aim:
To determine the prevalence of obstetric violence in the Spanish healthcare system and identify the associated factors.
Methods:
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted during 2019 and included 899 women who had given birth in the last 12 months. An online questionnaire was distributed through midwives and women associations in Spain. The questionnaire included sociodemographic, clinical, and assistance practices variables. The primary outcome variable was obstetric violence and its verbal, physical, and psycho-affective types. Crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted OR (ORa) were estimated using binary logistic regression.
Results:
Obstetric violence was reported by 67.4% (606) of the women; 25.1% (226) verbal, 54.5% (490) physical, and 36.7% (330) psycho-affective. Overall obstetric violence was observed more frequently in women who attended maternal education programme (ORa 1.56, 95% CI 1.05-2.32), those who presented a birth plan but it was not respected (ORa 2.82, 95% CI 1.27-6.29), those who received regional analgesia (ORa 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.30), those who required an urgent caesarean section (ORa 3.46, 95% CI 1.79-6.69), underwent an episiotomy (ORa 3.34, 95% CI 2.21-5.38), and whose newborn was admitted to an intensive care unit (ORa 2.73, 95% CI: 1.21-6.15). The presentation of a birth plan was observed as protective factors, and the possibility of skin-to-skin (ORa 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.62) and felt respected (ORa 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.85).
Conclusions:
Two out of three women perceive having suffered obstetric violence during childbirth. Practices such as skin-to-skin contact, and the use of respected birth plans, were protective factors against obstetric violence.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Cross-Sectional Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...

