Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brief tone audiometry: a review.

W O Olsen1

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Ear and Hearing
|August 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review highlights varied results in temporal integration of acoustic power, impacting brief tone audiometry for hearing assessments. Understanding these differences is key for accurate hearing diagnostics in both normal and impaired hearing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Use of TEOAE, ABR, and Acoustic Reflex Measures to Assess Auditory Function Patients With Acoustic Neuroma.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Auditory brainstem response and magnetic resonance imaging for acoustic neuromas: costs by prevalence.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2000
Same author

Head trauma and mid-frequency hearing loss.

American journal of audiology·2000
Same author

A bit of history on standards for acoustical measurements of hearing aids.

American journal of audiology·1999
Same author

Penetrating injury to the brainstem after a nailgun accident: a case study.

American journal of audiology·1999
Same author

Nonsurgical factors predictive of postoperative hearing for patients with vestibular schwannoma.

The American journal of otology·1997
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Temporal integration of acoustic power is crucial for hearing perception.
  • Variability in this integration affects audiological assessments.
  • Current understanding is based on diverse study findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing studies on temporal integration of acoustic power at threshold.
  • To identify and analyze the variability in results across different populations.
  • To assess the implications of this variability for clinical audiology.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of studies on temporal integration.
  • Analysis of data from normal-hearing individuals.
  • Analysis of data from hearing-impaired patients.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A wide range of results was observed in temporal integration.
  • Significant variability exists between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups.
  • Inconsistencies were found even within these groups.

Conclusions:

  • The variability in temporal integration findings limits current clinical use.
  • Brief tone audiometry applications are restricted by these inconsistencies.
  • Further research is needed to standardize measurement and interpretation.