Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Trophic Efficiency00:46

Trophic Efficiency

24.2K
Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.
24.2K
Production Efficiency01:01

Production Efficiency

17.6K
Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).
17.6K
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress02:45

Responses to Heat and Cold Stress

14.4K
Every organism has an optimum temperature range within which healthy growth and physiological functioning can occur. At the ends of this range, there will be a minimum and maximum temperature that interrupt biological processes.
14.4K
Factors Influencing Microbial Growth: Temperature01:27

Factors Influencing Microbial Growth: Temperature

826
Microorganisms display remarkable adaptations, enabling them to thrive in diverse ecological niches across a wide range of temperatures. Temperature profoundly influences microbial growth by affecting enzymatic activity, membrane fluidity, and other cellular processes.Each microorganism operates within a specific temperature range defined by three cardinal points: minimum, optimum, and maximum. Below the minimum temperature, membranes lose fluidity, halting transport processes. Above the...
826
Effects of Temperature on Free Energy02:11

Effects of Temperature on Free Energy

27.6K
The spontaneity of a process depends upon the temperature of the system. Phase transitions, for example, will proceed spontaneously in one direction or the other depending upon the temperature of the substance in question. Likewise, some chemical reactions can also exhibit temperature-dependent spontaneities. To illustrate this concept, the equation relating free energy change to the enthalpy and entropy changes for the process is considered:
27.6K
Meristems and Plant Growth02:36

Meristems and Plant Growth

48.4K
Plants grow throughout their lives; this is called indeterminate growth, and it distinguishes plants from most animals. Although certain parts of plants stop growing (e.g., leaves and flowers), others grow continuously—like roots and stems.
48.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A meta-analysis of carbon losses and gains from tropical moist forest degradation and regeneration.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Vegetation browning patterns under compound soil and atmospheric dryness in northern permafrost ecosystems.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Observation-constrained sensitivities of Arctic methane emissions to warming.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Rising tree mortality in France is associated with distinct seasonal climate anomalies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Clearing the noise to predict the rhythm of the North Atlantic climate.

Science advances·2026
Same author

National pathways of land-use CO₂ emissions in the 21<sup>st</sup> century.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

PCSK5 promotes angiogenesis and cardiac repair after myocardial infarction.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

PfApiAT2 is a proline transporter essential for the transmission of Plasmodium falciparum by the mosquito vector.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Transient distortions of the South Atlantic Anomaly radiation environments driven by electric fields.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Structural basis of the regulation by CDK11 kinase of early spliceosome activation and evidence for its proofreading by DHX15 helicase.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Structural and mechanistic insights into primer synthesis initiation by DNA primase.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Changes in heritability and shared environmentality of educational attainment across twentieth-century Norway.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 4, 2025

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment
08:39

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment

Published on: October 28, 2022

3.4K

Forest production efficiency increases with growth temperature.

A Collalti1,2, A Ibrom3, A Stockmarr4

  • 1National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (ISAFOM), 06128, Perugia (PG), Italy.

Nature Communications
|October 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forest production efficiency increases with latitude and precipitation, but surprisingly, also with temperature, contrary to ecosystem models. This metric is key for understanding forest carbon uptake and biomass production.

More Related Videos

Forced Flowering in Mandarin Trees under Phytotron Conditions
08:42

Forced Flowering in Mandarin Trees under Phytotron Conditions

Published on: March 6, 2019

9.3K
Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
09:05

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Published on: June 24, 2019

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 4, 2025

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment
08:39

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment

Published on: October 28, 2022

3.4K
Forced Flowering in Mandarin Trees under Phytotron Conditions
08:42

Forced Flowering in Mandarin Trees under Phytotron Conditions

Published on: March 6, 2019

9.3K
Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
09:05

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites

Published on: June 24, 2019

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Forestry
  • Climate Science

Background:

  • Forest production efficiency (FPE) quantifies carbon partitioning into biomass production (BP) or net primary production (NPP).
  • FPE is crucial for forest productivity and atmospheric CO2 sequestration.
  • Understanding FPE drivers is vital for accurate climate change impact assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To globally analyze the relationship between Forest Production Efficiency (FPE) and stand-age and climate variables.
  • To investigate the influence of latitude, precipitation, temperature, and stand-age on FPE.
  • To compare empirical findings with predictions from current ecosystem models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a large compilation of global data on gross primary production.
  • Analyzed data on either biomass production (BP) or net primary production (NPP) to calculate FPE.
  • Performed statistical analysis to determine relationships between FPE, stand-age, and climate factors.

Main Results:

  • Forest Production Efficiency (FPE) increases with absolute latitude, precipitation, and temperature.
  • Confirmed previous findings that FPE declines with increasing stand-age.
  • Observed a temperature effect on FPE contrary to short-term physiological expectations, suggesting top-down regulation.

Conclusions:

  • Forest Production Efficiency exhibits complex responses to climate, with a notable positive correlation with temperature.
  • Current ecosystem models inaccurately predict lower FPE in warmer climates, likely overestimating carbon losses.
  • Findings highlight the need for revised ecosystem models to better represent forest carbon dynamics under climate change.