Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Systemic Therapy and Sequencing Options in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network
Mohamad Bassam Sonbol1, Irbaz Bin Riaz2, Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi3
1Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Importance:
The treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently changed and become relatively confusing. Head-to-head comparisons between most of the available agents have not been performed and are less likely to be examined in a prospective fashion in the future. Therefore, a network meta-analysis (NMA) is helpful to compare different agents from across different trials.
Objective:
To evaluate comparative effectiveness of different systemic treatments in advanced patients with HCC across lines of therapy.
Data Sources:
We searched various databases for abstracts and full-text articles published from database inception through March 2020.
Study Selection:
We included phase 3 trials evaluating different vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis), checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), or their combinations in advanced HCC, in the first-line or refractory setting.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
The reporting of this systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. The overall effect was pooled using the random effects model.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Outcomes of interest included overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Findings:
Fourteen trials (8 in the first-line setting and 6 in the second-line setting) at low risk of bias were included. The 8 trials in the first-line setting encompassed a total of 6290 patients, with an age range of 18 to 89 years. The 5 trials included in the second-line analysis encompassed a total of 2653 patients, with an age range of 18 to 91 years. Network meta-analysis showed the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was superior in patients with HCC treated in the first-line setting compared with lenvatinib (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89), sorafenib (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.80), and nivolumab (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.98). In the refractory setting, NMA showed that all studied drugs had PFS benefit compared with placebo. However, this only translated into OS benefit with regorafenib (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.75) and cabozantinib (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.92) compared with placebo. In the NMA of patients with α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels of 400 ng/mL or greater, regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab showed PFS and OS benefit compared with placebo with no superiority of an active drug compared with any others.
Conclusions And Relevance:
This systematic review and NMA of 14 trials found that atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination is now considered the standard of care in the first-line setting in patients with advanced HCC. Regorafenib and cabozantinib are preferred options in refractory patients, with ramucirumab as an additional option in those with levels of AFP of 400 ng/mL or higher. Future trials should focus on other potential combinations and best treatment strategy in patients with prior VEGFi/CPI exposure.
Insights
The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is the standard of care for first-line advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Regorafenib and cabozantinib are preferred for refractory HCC, with ramucirumab for patients with high AFP levels.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is complex, lacking direct head-to-head comparisons between systemic agents.
- Network meta-analysis (NMA) is crucial for comparing diverse treatments across trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatments for advanced HCC across different lines of therapy.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for treatment selection in advanced HCC.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and NMA of phase 3 trials including vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis), checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), and their combinations.
- Included first-line and refractory settings for advanced HCC, analyzing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
- Followed PRISMA guidelines, utilizing random effects models for data synthesis.
Main Results:
- In the first-line setting, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab demonstrated superior efficacy compared to lenvatinib, sorafenib, and nivolumab.
- For refractory HCC, regorafenib and cabozantinib showed PFS and OS benefits over placebo.
- In patients with high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (≥400 ng/mL), regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab offered PFS and OS benefits.
Conclusions:
- Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination is the new standard of care for first-line advanced HCC.
- Regorafenib and cabozantinib are preferred options for refractory HCC, with ramucirumab as an alternative for specific patient subgroups.
- Future research should explore novel combinations and optimal strategies for patients with prior exposure to VEGFis/CPIs.
More Related Videos
09:11Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
06:38An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers