Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

08:05
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
10.0K
Successive negative contrast effects in a risk-sensitive foraging procedure.
Baine B Craft1, Waverly A James1, Danielle L Reaves1
1Department of Psychology, Seattle Pacific University.
Summary
Rats showed increased risk-taking behavior when reward quality decreased, demonstrating a contrast effect in foraging. This suggests animals may seek higher-quality rewards even if overall payoffs are lower after a sudden downshift.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral neuroscience
- Animal behavior
- Foraging theory
Background:
- Successive negative contrast effects are well-documented in operant conditioning.
- Limited research exists on how reward quality downshifts impact foraging behavior.
- Risk-sensitive foraging frameworks can illuminate these effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of a sudden reward quality downshift on risk-sensitive foraging in rats.
- To compare the behavior of rats experiencing a reward downshift with a control group.
Main Methods:
- Rats chose between variable and fixed options with equal mean reward (sugar pellets).
- One group (contrast) was shifted from 100% to 20% sugar pellets.
- A control group received 20% sugar pellets throughout.
Main Results:
- Rats in the contrast group exhibited more risk-prone choices after the downshift.
- Behavioral measures like rejected food and latency to choice significantly changed.
- Findings indicated a contrast effect, aligning with some previous studies.
Conclusions:
- Sudden downshifts in reward quality induce significant behavioral changes in foraging animals.
- Animals may develop a bias for higher-quality reward patches, even with potentially lower overall payoffs.
- This highlights the importance of reward history in decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
13.0K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.0K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.8K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.8K

