Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025
06:19
In situ Protocol for Butterfly Pupal Wings Using Riboprobes
Published on: May 28, 2007
11.3K
A release from developmental bias accelerates morphological diversification in butterfly eyespots.
Oskar Brattström1,2, Kwaku Aduse-Poku3, Erik van Bergen3
1Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EJ Cambridge, United Kingdom; oskar.brattstrom@gmail.com.
Summary
Developmental bias shapes butterfly eyespot evolution, but innovations in the genus Heteropsis allow independent color control. This releases evolutionary constraints, enabling rapid diversification and morphological change.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo)
- Comparative genomics and morphology
- Insect wing pattern evolution
Background:
- Eyespots in Nymphalidae butterflies are key traits for predator defense and sexual selection.
- Previous research on Bicyclus anynana indicated fixed eyespot color composition due to shared developmental pathways, limiting evolutionary divergence.
- This developmental constraint was considered a significant factor in wing pattern evolution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of developmental bias in the evolutionary diversification of eyespot color composition across the Mycalesina butterfly subtribe.
- To identify mechanisms by which developmental bias can be released, allowing for novel evolutionary trajectories.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of eyespot morphology across the Mycalesina subtribe.
- Experimental manipulation of pupal wings to assess developmental responses.
- Phylogenetic surveys to understand evolutionary patterns of eyespot traits.
Main Results:
- Developmental bias significantly shapes evolutionary diversification of eyespot color in most Mycalesina, except for the genus Heteropsis.
- The genus Heteropsis exhibits independent control over eyespot color composition, overcoming the ancestral developmental constraint.
- Experimental wing manipulations revealed a novel regional tissue response to conserved patterning signals as the mechanism for releasing this bias.
Conclusions:
- Developmental processes can constrain the independent evolution of traits, influencing evolutionary trajectories.
- Developmental innovations can release these constraints, facilitating rapid morphological change and evolutionary diversification.
- The study highlights the dynamic interplay between developmental bias and evolutionary innovation in shaping biodiversity.
Related Concept Videos
01:07Speciation Rates
22.4K
Overview
22.4K
02:32Position-effect Variegation
6.8K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
6.8K
01:21Frequency-dependent Selection
22.8K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.8K
02:27Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
7.1K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.1K