A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia

Osama A Bawazir1

  • 1Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine in Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Medicine, KSA, P.O.box 715, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.

Insights

Gomco circumcision is safer for infants under six months, showing fewer complications than the Plastibell method. This study compared complication rates for Gomco versus Plastibell circumcision in infants.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Neonatal Care

Background:

  • Gomco and Plastibell devices are common methods for infant circumcision.
  • Assessing complications in infants up to six months is crucial for safe procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the complication incidence of Gomco and Plastibell circumcision methods in infants younger than six months.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized study involving 805 infants under six months.
  • Infants were randomized into Plastibell (Group P) and Gomco (Group G) circumcision groups.
  • Statistical analysis included Chi-square and independent sample t-tests (P<0.05 significance).

Main Results:

  • The Plastibell method had significantly lower bleeding volumes compared to the Gomco method (P<0.001).
  • However, the Plastibell device was associated with a higher incidence of complications, including infection, edema, migration, and redundant skin (P<0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Gomco circumcision is identified as the safer method.
  • The Gomco method demonstrates a lower rate of infant circumcision complications.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos