Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation
Published on: September 19, 2018
[Case load and quality indicators in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms]
Y Carmen Ahmadzadeh1, Th Schmitz-Rixen2, D Böckler3
1Klinik für Gefäß- und Endovascularchirurgie und des Universitären Wundzentrums, Klinikum der Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/M, Deutschland. Yasmin-Carmen.Ahmadzadeh@kgu.de.
Background:
The MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length of stay) was proposed as a surrogate parameter for evaluating the quality of large and potentially complication-prone visceral surgical interventions.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to find out to what extent the MTL30 can be correlated with the results of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) registry of the German Institute for Vascular Health Research (DIGG) of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG) and with the case volume of the participating hospitals.
Material And Methods:
Elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) was performed in 14,282 patients and open repair (OAR) in 3923 patients. Case volume of the treating hospitals, hospital mortality, length of stay and transfer to another acute care hospital were determined 30 days after the index intervention.
Results:
The hospital mortality was 1.3% for EVAR and 4.9% for OAR (p = 0.000), the MTL30 was 5.0% and 14.4%, respectively (p = 0.000). For EVAR, no relationship between case volume and hospital mortality (quintile 1: 1.0%; quintile 5: 1.3%) as well as case volume and MTL30 (quintile 1: 5.3%; quintile 5: 5.3%) could be demonstrated. Also in OAR there was no significant relationship between case volume and hospital mortality (quintile 1: 5.8%, quintile 5: 3.5%; p = 0.505) and case volume and MTL30 (quintile 1: 16.4%, quintile 5: 12.2%, p = 0.110). With a hospital mortality rate of 7.2% (5-10%) the MTL30 for OAR was 17.6%. In both EVAR and OAR, the length of stay correlated significantly with hospital mortality and MTL30.
Discussion:
A clear relationship between hospital case volume and hospital mortality could not be shown in the AAA registry of the DIGG. The same was true for the MTL30. It remains to be seen whether the MTL30 offers an additional benefit compared to the recording of hospital mortality and inpatient length of stay as a quality parameter.
Insights
The MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length of stay) did not correlate with hospital case volume in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Further research is needed to determine if MTL30 offers benefits over existing quality parameters.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Health Services Research
- Surgical Quality Assessment
Background:
- The MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length of stay) was developed as a surrogate parameter for assessing the quality of complex visceral surgical procedures.
- Evaluating quality indicators in high-risk surgeries is crucial for patient outcomes and healthcare system efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the correlation between the MTL30 and outcomes in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
- To investigate the relationship between hospital case volume and the MTL30 in AAA repair.
- To compare the effectiveness of MTL30 against traditional quality metrics.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in 14,282 patients and open repair (OAR) in 3923 patients.
- Data collection included hospital mortality, length of stay, and patient transfers within 30 days post-intervention.
- Correlation analysis between case volume (by hospital quintiles) and MTL30 outcomes.
Main Results:
- Hospital mortality was 1.3% for EVAR and 4.9% for OAR; MTL30 was 5.0% for EVAR and 14.4% for OAR.
- No significant relationship was found between hospital case volume and hospital mortality or MTL30 for either EVAR or OAR.
- Length of stay showed a significant correlation with hospital mortality and MTL30 in both EVAR and OAR procedures.
Conclusions:
- The study found no clear link between hospital case volume and mortality or MTL30 in AAA repair, challenging volume-outcome relationships.
- The utility of MTL30 as a quality parameter requires further investigation, especially in comparison to established metrics like mortality and length of stay.
- The findings suggest that focusing solely on case volume may not adequately reflect surgical quality in AAA repair.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Development and Characterization of a Mouse Model for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 2, 2024
10:09Drug Treatment by Central Venous Catheter in a Mouse Model of Angiotensin II Induced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Monitoring by 3D Ultrasound
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management