Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

04:56
Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
8.3K
Social media and vaccine hesitancy
Steven Lloyd Wilson1, Charles Wiysonge2
1Politics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA wilson.steven.lloyd@gmail.com.
BMJ Global Health
|October 24, 2020
Summary
Social media organizing and foreign disinformation campaigns significantly increase vaccine hesitancy and decrease vaccination rates globally. Understanding these online threats is crucial for public health initiatives.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Social Sciences
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Anti-vaccination efforts on social media pose a significant threat to global health.
- The need for worldwide COVID-19 vaccination programs highlights the urgency of understanding these threats.
Purpose of the Study:
- To globally evaluate the impact of social media and online foreign disinformation on vaccination rates.
- To assess the influence of social media on public attitudes towards vaccine safety.
Main Methods:
- A large-N cross-country regression framework was employed.
- Social media usage was operationalized by public organization for action and negative vaccine discourse (tweet analysis).
- Foreign-sourced disinformation operations and vaccine hesitancy (public belief and vaccination rates) were measured.
Main Results:
- Social media use for organizing action strongly predicts beliefs that vaccines are unsafe.
- Foreign disinformation significantly predicts a drop in mean vaccination coverage (2 percentage points per unit increase).
- Foreign disinformation also increases negative vaccine-related social media activity by 15%.
Conclusions:
- A significant relationship exists between social media organization and public doubts about vaccine safety.
- Foreign disinformation campaigns are substantially linked to declining vaccination coverage.
Keywords:
vaccinesMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
49.9K
Overview
49.9K
Social Proof
31.2K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.2K
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
100
Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
100
Group Polarization
38.1K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.1K
Bystander Effect
10.0K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
10.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.0K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.0K

