Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 4, 2025

In Vivo Mouse Model of Spinal Implant Infection
Published on: June 23, 2020
The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on infection rates in mohs micrographic surgery: a single-institution
Oliver Taylor1, Jeffrey Niu Li1, Christian Carr1
1Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5939 Harry Hines Blvd, 4th Floor, Suite 100, Dallas, 75390, USA.
Abstract:
As data and recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery vary, we tried to describe the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) on infective endocarditis, prosthetic joint infection, and surgical site infection using a single-institution retrospective cohort study of antibiotic use (pre-/intra-operative, post-operative or none) among 2,364 patient encouters treated with MMS. Bivariate logistic regression was evaluated for associations between patient and operative characteristics, antibiotic use, and infectious complications. 85.8% of patients received no AP, 10.0% received post-operative AP, and 4.1% received pre-/intra-operative AP. The overall surgical site infection (SSI) rate was 1.3%. SSI did not differ between patients who received pre-/intra-operative prophylaxis, post-operative prophylaxis or no antibiotics. One patient receiving pre-/intra-operative prophylaxis developed SSI. Repairs involving porcine xenografts and interpolation/pedicle flaps were associated with increased SSI. In addition, there were no patients who post-operatively experienced an infected joint or infective endocarditis. Limitations include selection bias, use of observational retrospective data, low infection rates, single institution analysis, and possible omission of explanatory variables or confounders. There was no difference in rates of SSI when comparing MMS patients who received pre-/intra-operative, post-operative or no AP. There were no cases of infective endocarditis or infected prosthetic joint.
Insights
Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) did not significantly impact surgical site infections (SSI), prosthetic joint infections, or infective endocarditis. Most patients received no AP, and infection rates remained low across all groups.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Surgical Oncology
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) guidelines for dermatologic surgery, including Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), lack consistent recommendations.
- Variations in AP practices may influence postoperative infectious complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens (pre-/intra-operative, post-operative, or none) on infectious complications in patients undergoing MMS.
- To assess the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI), prosthetic joint infections, and infective endocarditis following MMS.
Main Methods:
- A single-institution retrospective cohort study analyzed 2,364 patient encounters treated with MMS.
- Bivariate logistic regression was used to examine associations between patient/operative characteristics, AP use, and infectious complications.
- Patients were categorized by AP use: none (85.8%), post-operative (10.0%), or pre-/intra-operative (4.1%).
Main Results:
- The overall SSI rate was 1.3%, with no significant difference observed between groups receiving no AP, post-operative AP, or pre-/intra-operative AP.
- Repairs utilizing porcine xenografts and interpolation/pedicle flaps were associated with increased SSI risk.
- No cases of infective endocarditis or prosthetic joint infection were reported in any AP group.
Conclusions:
- Antibiotic prophylaxis does not appear to alter the risk of SSI, infective endocarditis, or prosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery.
- Surgical factors like graft type and flap reconstruction may be more influential in SSI development.
- Further research with larger, multi-institutional studies may be warranted to confirm these findings.
More Related Videos
05:32Povidone Iodine Rectal Preparation at Time of Prostate Needle Biopsy is a Simple and Reproducible Means to Reduce Risk of Procedural Infection
Published on: September 21, 2015
07:16Development of a Polymicrobial Colony Biofilm Model to Test Antimicrobials in Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: September 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...