Proximal Interphalangeal Hyperextension Injuries in Children: The Development of a Clinical Decision Guide

Christina N Steiger1, Romain Dayer1, Anne Tabard-Fougère1

  • 1Service of Pediatric Orthopedics, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

The Journal of Pediatrics
|October 25, 2020
PubMed

Insights

A clinical decision guide for pediatric hyperextension finger injuries can accurately identify low-risk cases, reducing the need for X-rays. This approach enhances patient care and minimizes unnecessary radiation exposure.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Hyperextension injuries of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint are common in children.
  • Accurate diagnosis is crucial to differentiate between minor sprains and significant fractures or dislocations.
  • Current diagnostic protocols often rely heavily on radiographic imaging, leading to potential overuse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a clinical decision guide for diagnosing and managing acute hyperextension injuries of long fingers in patients under 16 years old.
  • To establish high-risk and low-risk indicators for severe injury based on clinical examination and radiographic findings.
  • To assess the predictive value of a standardized clinical examination in identifying low-risk injuries.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study included 300 consecutive patients under 16 years with acute PIP joint hyperextension injuries.
  • A standardized clinical examination assessed pain location, swelling, bruising, stability, and mobility.
  • Radiographs were analyzed for pathological findings, and risk of late complications was assessed.

Main Results:

  • The majority of children (67%) presenting with hyperextension finger trauma did not have a fracture.
  • No child with a low-risk clinical examination had a subsequent high-risk diagnosis (e.g., intra-articular fracture, dislocation).
  • Out of 64 clinically high-risk diagnoses, only 12 significant fractures were identified.

Conclusions:

  • A standardized clinical examination protocol can guide treatment decisions for PIP hyperextension injuries.
  • The developed clinical decision guide demonstrates 100% sensitivity in ruling out significant injuries.
  • Implementing this guide can reduce the number of avoidable radiographs, improve patient care, decrease emergency department wait times, and lower healthcare costs.
Abstract