Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Greek version of Reflective Functioning Questionnaire
F Griva1, V Pomini1, R Gournellis2
1First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
|October 25, 2020
Summary
The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) is a reliable and valid measure for assessing mentalizing abilities in Greek populations. This study validates the RFQ for research and clinical use, showing its potential in understanding mentalizing impairments.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Mentalizing, the ability to understand mental states, is crucial for self-organization and emotional regulation.
- The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) is a new measure designed to assess mentalizing capabilities.
- Validation of the RFQ is necessary for its effective use in research and clinical settings, particularly in diverse populations like the Greek population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) in Greek populations.
- To assess the psychometric properties of the RFQ, including its reliability and validity.
- To evaluate the RFQ's utility for research and clinical practice concerning mentalizing abilities.
Main Methods:
- A principal component analysis was conducted on data from 219 participants (102 with type 1 diabetes, 117 healthy individuals).
- The study examined the internal consistencies of the RFQ's subscales (RF certainty and RF uncertainty).
- Relationships between RFQ scores and measures of psychological distress, empathy, and emotional intelligence were analyzed to establish validity.
Main Results:
- The principal component analysis supported a 2-factor model for the RFQ in both clinical and healthy samples.
- Internal consistencies for both RF certainty (α=0.80) and RF uncertainty (α=0.79) subscales were satisfactory.
- Significant associations were found between RFQ scores and psychological distress, empathy, and emotional intelligence, supporting the scale's validity. Older participants showed more balanced reflective functioning.
Conclusions:
- The current data support the reliability and validity of the RFQ for research use in assessing mentalizing impairments.
- Further research, including test-retest analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, is recommended.
- Extending validity testing to clinical populations is crucial for supporting the RFQ's application in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
618
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
618
Five-Factor Theory of Personality
1.5K
The five-factor model, often called the Big Five personality traits, is widely accepted in psychology as a comprehensive framework for understanding personality. These five traits — Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism — are often remembered using the acronym OCEAN.
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
1.5K
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
1.9K
Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the...
In contrast, source traits are the...
1.9K
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
112
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
112
Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck
930
Hans and Sybil Eysenck developed a widely recognized theory of personality, which emphasizes the role of temperament and genetically based differences in shaping individual traits. Their theory posits that biological factors primarily determine personality and can be understood through two main dimensions: extroversion/introversion and neuroticism/stability.
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
930
Introspection
118
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
118


