Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
Quality of Care for Acute Kidney Disease: Current Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions
Kathleen D Liu1,2, Lui G Forni3, Michael Heung4
1Division of Nephrology, Departments of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Insights
Guidance for quality care after acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) is limited, with few patients receiving necessary follow-up. Establishing quality metrics can improve outcomes for these common hospital complications.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) are frequent hospital complications linked to poor patient outcomes.
- Existing guidelines address AKI/AKD care during hospitalization but offer limited direction for post-discharge quality metrics.
- Many patients do not receive essential follow-up laboratory testing or specialized care after AKI/AKD episodes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the lack of quality improvement guidance for patients after hospital discharge for AKI or AKD.
- To highlight the importance of establishing specific quality metrics for post-AKI/AKD care.
- To provide evidence-based and expert-opinion guidance for managing patients after AKI/AKD hospitalization.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent consensus statements from the Acute Disease Quality Initiative on quality improvement goals for AKI/AKD.
- Analysis of current gaps in follow-up care for patients with AKI/AKD.
- Development of recommendations for quality indicators and follow-up care intensity based on patient factors.
Main Results:
- Limited data exists for guiding post-discharge care of AKI/AKD patients.
- Healthcare systems should quantify follow-up care receipt for patients post-AKI/AKD.
- Distinct quality indicators are needed for AKI/AKD patients requiring dialysis post-discharge.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant opportunity to improve patient care and outcomes by establishing robust quality measures for post-AKI/AKD care.
- Follow-up care intensity should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and AKI/AKD severity.
- Developing specific quality indicators for AKI/AKD patients requiring ongoing dialysis is crucial.
Abstract:
Acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) are common complications in hospitalized patients and are associated with adverse outcomes. Although consensus guidelines have improved the care of patients with AKI and AKD, guidance regarding quality metrics in the care of patients after an episode of AKI or AKD is limited. For example, few patients receive follow-up laboratory testing of kidney function or post-AKI or AKD care through nephrology or other providers. Recently, the Acute Disease Quality Initiative developed a consensus statement regarding quality improvement goals for patients with AKI or AKD specifically highlighting efforts regarding quality and safety of care after hospital discharge after an episode of AKI or AKD. The goal is to use these measures to identify opportunities for improvement that will positively affect outcomes. We recommend that health care systems quantitate the proportion of patients who need and actually receive follow-up care after the index AKI or AKD hospitalization. The intensity and appropriateness of follow-up care should depend on patient characteristics, severity, duration, and course of AKI of AKD, and should evolve as evidence-based guidelines emerge. Quality indicators for discharged patients with dialysis requiring AKI or AKD should be distinct from end-stage renal disease measures. Besides, there should be specific quality indicators for those still requiring dialysis in the outpatient setting after AKI or AKD. Given the limited preexisting data guiding the care of patients after an episode of AKI or AKD, there is ample opportunity to establish quality measures and potentially improve patient care and outcomes. This review will provide specific evidence-based and expert opinion-based guidance for the care of patients with AKI or AKD after hospital discharge.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology

