Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Utility of Common Biomarkers for Diagnosing Infection in Nonunion
Mark R Brinker1,2,3, Jenny Macek2,3, Mitzi Laughlin1
1Fondren Orthopedic Research Institute, Houston, TX.
Leukocyte count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) do not reliably distinguish septic from aseptic nonunions. These common lab tests were not significant predictors of infection in a study of 211 nonunions.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Disease
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- Nonunion of bone fractures can be challenging to manage, with infection being a critical complication.
- Distinguishing between septic (infected) and aseptic (non-infected) nonunions is crucial for appropriate treatment.
- Standard laboratory tests, including leukocyte count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP), are often used to aid in diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of WBC, ESR, and CRP in differentiating septic from aseptic nonunions.
- To determine if these inflammatory markers can accurately predict the presence of infection at the nonunion site.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study design was employed at a quaternary referral center.
- 211 nonunions requiring surgery were included, with blood samples collected preoperatively for WBC, ESR, and CRP analysis.
- Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated, and logistic regression models were used to assess the predictive value of each test, adjusting for preoperative antibiotics.
Main Results:
- The prevalence of infection among the nonunions was 19%.
- Positive likelihood ratios for WBC, ESR, and CRP were low and not statistically significant in predicting infection.
- Multivariable analysis indicated that WBC, ESR, and CRP were not significant predictors of infection in this cohort.
Conclusions:
- The study found that preoperative WBC, ESR, and CRP levels are not significant predictors for distinguishing septic from aseptic nonunions.
- These commonly used laboratory tests have limited diagnostic utility in identifying infection in nonunion cases.
- Further research may be needed to identify more reliable biomarkers for diagnosing infection in nonunions.
More Related Videos
07:48High Spatial Resolution Chemical Imaging of Implant-Associated Infections with X-ray Excited Luminescence Chemical Imaging Through Tissue
Published on: September 30, 2022
18:40Combined In vivo Optical and µCT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice
Published on: October 16, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test