Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
Christopher A Bobier1, Adam Omelianchuk2
1Department of Philosophy, Saint Mary's University of Minnesota, Winona, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract:
Giubilini and Minerva argue that the permissibility of abortion entails the permissibility of infanticide. Proponents of what we refer to as the Birth Strategy claim that there is a morally significant difference brought about at birth that accounts for our strong intuition that killing newborns is morally impermissible. We argue that strategy does not account for the moral intuition that late-term, non-therapeutic abortions are morally impermissible. Advocates of the Birth Strategy must either judge non-therapeutic abortions as impermissible in the later stages of pregnancy or conclude that they are permissible on the basis of premises that are far less intuitively plausible than the opposite conclusion and its supporting premises.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethics and Bioethics
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...


