Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

07:32
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.6K
Morphometric analysis of palatal rugae in different malocclusions
Maria E Saadeh1,2,3, Ramzi V Haddad4, Joseph G Ghafari3,5
1Department of Forensic Odontology, Anthropology and Human Identification, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Summary
Palatal rugae (PR) measurements differ among malocclusion types, particularly vertical patterns. These findings suggest PR may adapt to environmental influences during development, especially in Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Orthodontics
- Human Anatomy
Background:
- Palatal rugae (PR) are unique anatomical landmarks on the palate.
- Limited research exists on the association between PR and malocclusion.
- PR are considered relatively stable but can be affected by treatments like rapid maxillary expansion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between morphometric measurements of palatal rugae (PR) and sagittal/vertical malocclusion characteristics.
- To test the hypothesis that PR differ among malocclusions due to genetic and environmental factors.
Main Methods:
- Laser scanning of maxillary dental casts from 243 individuals.
- Measurement of the first three PR in transverse and anteroposterior directions.
- Analysis of variance and Pearson correlations comparing PR measurements with cephalometric data across different malocclusion classes (I, II, III) and vertical patterns (hypo-, normo-, hyperdivergent).
Main Results:
- Significant differences in PR measurements were found among malocclusion groups, especially related to vertical patterns.
- Class II Division 2 subjects exhibited the largest transverse and anteroposterior PR measurements.
- PR orientation varied with vertical patterns, being more anterior in hypodivergent individuals; transverse rugae separation was smaller in these groups. Correlations were generally low.
Conclusions:
- Palatal rugae (PR) may exhibit adaptation to environmental influences in developing malocclusions, notably in the Class II Division 2 phenotype.
- Further longitudinal research is needed to understand long-term environmental impacts on PR morphology, superimposed on genetic influences.

