Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems - In
Siddique Mohammed Qureshi1, Nayana Shriram Anasane1, Dilip Kakade1
1Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Background:
Gingival retraction cord is the most commonly used gingival displacement material; however, it causes discomfort and produces damage to the periodontium. Various new gingival retraction materials have been introduced to overcome these problems. This in vivo study was conducted to compare the efficacy of three recent gingival displacement materials in achieving gingival tissue displacement.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 10 subjects was selected and 40 samples were made for the study. Samples were divided into four groups depending on the materials used for gingival displacement. The schedule for gingival displacement and impression making followed Latin block design. On day 1, baseline impression was made without gingival displacement. On day 2, day 22, and day 42 impressions were made after gingival displacement on intact maxillary right central incisor with any one of the three agents. The amount of gingival displacement was then measured as a distance from the tooth to the crest of the gingiva in a horizontal plane using stereomicroscope.
Results:
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. The amount of gingival displacement obtained by all the experimental groups was more than the control group (P < 0.01). Among the experimental groups, astringent gingival retraction paste showed the highest value for gingival displacement (0.50 mm) followed by the stay-put retraction cord (0.48 mm), whereas expasyl (0.34 mm) showed the least value.
Conclusion:
Within the limitations of this in vivo study, astringent gingival retraction paste showed the highest value for gingival displacement followed by stay-put retraction cord whereas, expasyl showed the least value.
