Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

15:01
Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
Published on: January 18, 2013
15.8K
Inter-group relationships influence territorial defence in mountain gorillas
Robin E Morrison1,2, Jean Paul Hirwa1, Jean Pierre S Mucyo1
1The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Musanze, Rwanda.
The Journal of Animal Ecology
|October 28, 2020
Summary
Mountain gorillas
Area of Science:
- Primate behavior
- Socio-ecology
- Animal behavior
Background:
- Territoriality is common in species, with human space tolerance influenced by social bonds.
- The role of inter-group social relationships in non-human spatial use is poorly understood.
- Long-term relationships may evolve through shared resource access and dispute resolution.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate how social relationships influence spatial use and inter-group encounters in mountain gorillas.
- Examine the impact of social and spatial contexts on aggression and affiliation during encounters.
- Understand the role of retained social bonds in post-dispersal relationships.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 16 years of simultaneous movement and interaction data from 17 mountain gorilla groups.
- Quantified aggressive and affiliative behaviors during inter-group encounters.
- Assessed the influence of social history and spatial location (core vs. peripheral home range) on interactions.
Main Results:
- Observed territorial defense, with increased aggression towards home range centers.
- Groups that previously split exhibited more affiliation and less aggression in peripheral areas.
- Core home range encounters consistently resulted in higher aggression, irrespective of group history.
Conclusions:
- Social relationships between mountain gorilla groups persist after fission.
- These relationships facilitate reduced aggression when accessing neighbors' peripheral home ranges.
- Reduced inter-group aggression in shared spaces may drive the evolution of long-term relationships and complex societies.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
14.6K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.6K
Impact of Groups on Groups
146
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
146
Migration
8.5K
Migration is long-range, seasonal movement from one region or habitat to another. This common strategy, carried out by many different organisms around the world, is an adaptive response that typically corresponds to changes in an organism’s environment, like resource availability or climate. Migrations can involve huge groups of thousands of animals as well as single individuals traveling alone and can range from thousands of kilometers to just a few hundred meters.
8.5K
In- and Out-Groups
42.6K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.6K
Competition
23.9K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
23.9K
Habitat Fragmentation
20.6K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
20.6K

