Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure in Thailand
Unchalee Permsuwan1, Arintaya Phrommintikul2, Voratima Silavanich1
1Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cost-effective treatment for heart failure (HF) patients in Thailand. Despite higher initial costs, CRT significantly improves quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) within the national willingness-to-pay threshold.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Cardiology
- Medical technology assessment
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) enhances outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients.
- High costs of CRT pose challenges for middle-income countries like Thailand.
- Evaluating CRT's cost-effectiveness is crucial for resource allocation in Thai healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the cost-effectiveness of CRT combined with optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus OMT alone in Thai HF patients.
- To determine if CRT is a worthwhile investment within Thailand's healthcare budget constraints.
Main Methods:
- A two-component model assessed lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from a healthcare perspective.
- Clinical data derived from meta-analyses of landmark trials; Thai-specific data used for costs and non-cardiovascular risks.
- Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) calculated, with sensitivity analyses performed.
Main Results:
- CRT plus OMT incurred higher costs (123,279 THB) but yielded more QALYs (3.57) compared to OMT alone (11,165 THB, 2.49 QALYs).
- The ICER was 104,325 THB per QALY, which is below Thailand's willingness-to-pay threshold of 160,000 THB per QALY.
- Sensitivity analyses indicated that CRT maintenance costs significantly influence the results.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy is a cost-effective intervention for heart failure patients in Thailand.
- The clinical benefits of CRT are achievable at a reasonable cost, supporting its adoption in the Thai healthcare system.
- Cost-effectiveness supports the use of CRT within established economic benchmarks for therapeutic interventions.
Background:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms and survival in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the CRT devices are costly and can impose a significant burden to the relatively constrained health budgets of middle-income countries such as Thailand. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of CRT in combination with optimal medical therapy (OMT) relative to patients with OMT alone.
Methods:
A two-component model was used to analyze lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from a healthcare perspective. Clinical inputs were mostly obtained from meta-analysis of landmark trials. All cost-related data, risk of non-cardiovascular death and readmission rate were based on Thai HF data. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3%. Findings were reported as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A variety of sensitivity analyses were also performed.
Results:
CRT plus OMT costs more than OMT (123,279 vs 11,165 THB or 3,972.90 vs 359.81 USD), and is more effective (3.57 QALYs vs 2.49 QALYs), yielding an ICER of 104,325 THB per QALY (3,362.07 USD per QALY). CRT was cost-effective at the Thai willingness to pay threshold of 160,000 THB per QALY (5,156.30 USD per QALY). The results were sensitive to cost of CRT maintenance.
Conclusion:
The use of CRT was associated with a cost-effectiveness ratio below generally accepted benchmarks for therapeutic interventions of 160,000 THB per QALY (5,156.30 USD per QALY). This suggests that the clinical benefits of CRT can be achieved at a reasonable cost in Thai HF patients.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care


