Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Evaluation of the Cognitive Performance of Hypertensive Patients with Silent Cerebrovascular Lesions
Published on: April 23, 2021
Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Associated With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease MRI Burden and
Yangyi Fan1, Chang Hou2, Li Peng1
1Department of Neurology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
Background: Lacunar infarcts, white matter lesions, cerebral microbleed, enlarged perivascular space and brain atrophy are regarded as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). 24-hour blood pressure variability (BPV) has been reported to relate with cerebral small vessel disease, but the impact of 24-h BPV on the total MRI cSVD burden and its progression in inpatients with cerebrovascular disease has not been investigated yet. Methods: We enrolled inpatients with cerebrovascular disease, who underwent the 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and the brain MRI scan at baseline and had the follow-up brain MRI images stored in the clinical information system of our hospital. BPV was quantified by the calculation of standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), weighted standard deviation (wSD) of blood pressure record. We evaluated the total cSVD score on baseline MRI and the MRI followed-up to obtain the total burden of cSVD. The cSVD burden progression was estimated through the comparison of the total cSVD score on the two MRIs. Results: A total of 140 patients with an average age of 65.6 years were finally enrolled, 82.9% (116/140) of whom had one or more cSVD markers. After a median of 4.4 years follow-up, cSVD score progression were found in 50.7% (71/140) of the patients. Both SD and CV of SBP and DBP during 24-h and daytime as well as the SBP wSD differed significantly among different total cSVD score groups. The SBP SD and CV during 24-h and daytime, the SBP SD in nighttime, the DBP SD and CV during the daytime were significantly higher in the cSVD progression group than those in the cSVD no-progression group. The SBP wSD and the DBP wSD were significantly higher in the cSVD progression group than those in the cSVD no-progression group. Logistic regression analyses revealed that daytime SBP SD and SBP wSD were independent risk factors for total cSVD burden [daytime SBP SD: OR = 1.628, 95% CI = 1.105-2.398 (per 5 mmHg increase in SD), P = 0.014; SBP wSD: OR = 2.248, 95% CI = 1.564-3.230 (per 5 mmHg increase in wSD), P < 0.001)] and SBP wSD was a significant predictor for cSVD progression [OR = 2.990, 95% CI = 1.053-8.496 (per 5 mmHg increase in wSD), P = 0.040]. Conclusion: Higher BPV were significantly related with total cSVD burden in inpatients with cerebrovascular disease. SBP SD during daytime and SBP wSD were independent risk factor for total cSVD burden and SBP wSD was an predictive factor for cSVD progression.
More Related Videos
05:23Author Spotlight: Noninvasive Cerebral Blood Flow Determination in Human Functional Brain Region for Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Published on: May 31, 2024
11:26Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
Published on: December 10, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.