Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

10:45
Time-dependent Increase in the Network Response to the Stimulation of Neuronal Cell Cultures on Micro-electrode Arrays
Published on: May 29, 2017
10.2K
Calibration and Uncertainty in Neural Time-to-Event Modeling
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
|October 29, 2020
Summary
We introduce novel neural time-to-event models for accurate risk assessment. These models improve prediction calibration and uncertainty quantification for crucial time-to-event data analysis.
Area of Science:
- Machine Learning
- Statistics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Accurate prediction of event timing is vital for risk assessment in various fields.
- Traditional time-to-event (survival) models primarily focus on relative risk, not absolute event times.
- Existing models often lack sufficient calibration and uncertainty estimation for absolute predictions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop neural time-to-event models that predict accurate absolute event times.
- To enhance model calibration and uncertainty quantification in time-to-event predictions.
- To introduce novel methods for estimating and comparing conditional survival distributions.
Main Methods:
- Proposed adversarial nonparametric models for estimating time-to-event distributions.
- Introduced survival-function matching estimators to improve model calibration.
- Utilized distribution matching techniques for probabilistic predictions.
Main Results:
- The proposed neural time-to-event models demonstrate improved calibration and concentration of predicted event times.
- Distribution matching methods significantly outperform existing approaches in experiments.
- The survival-function matching estimator effectively accounts for model calibration and predictive uncertainty.
Conclusions:
- Neural time-to-event models offer a promising approach for accurate risk assessment.
- The developed methods provide better calibration and uncertainty estimation for time-to-event predictions.
- These advancements are crucial for reliable decision-making in applications relying on event time predictions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
98.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
98.6K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
9.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
1.5K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.5K
Uncertainty: Overview
1.3K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.3K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
3.9K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
3.9K

