Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
Objective measurement of limb bradykinesia using a marker-less tracking algorithm with 2D-video in PD patients
Jung Hwan Shin1, Jed Noel Ong1, Ryul Kim2
1Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Background:
Quantitative measurement of parkinsonian motor symptoms is crucial in clinical practice and in research. However, the widely used Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III is based on a semi-quantitative evaluation with high inter- and intra-rater variability. Sensor-based measurements have been widely studied but are limited for their accessibility.
Methods:
We analyzed 2D-RGB videos recording finger tapping and leg agility tests in 29 PD patients with a marker-less deep-learning based tracking algorithm. The tracking performance was validated with an accelerometer. Four parameters (mean amplitude, mean interpeak interval, amplitude variability and interpeak interval variability) were calculated from the position tracking.
Results:
The performance of the video-tracking was in good agreement with the accelerometer-based tracking (Intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.9 for the peak amplitude, and >0.6 for the interpeak interval). The video-tracking successfully captured variable aspects of limb bradykinesia that have a distinct correlation with the general parkinsonian motor symptoms and gait. In the finger-tapping task, the mean amplitude (R = -0.6, p = 2.4 × 10-6), amplitude variability (R = 0.36, p = 0.0092), mean interpeak interval (R = 0.34, p = 0.014), and interpeak interval variability (R = 0.66, p = 1.4 × 10-7) was significantly correlated with the UPDRS scores. In leg agility test, the mean amplitude (R = -0.58, p = 1.7 × 10-5), mean interpeak interval (R = 0.37, p = 0.0088) and interpeak interval variability (R = 0.7, p = 6.2 × 10-8) were significantly correlated with the UPDRS scores, but not with amplitude variability (R = 0.17, p = 0.26). Limb rigidity was significantly correlated with the interpeak interval (R = 0.40, p = 0.0036) and its variability (R = 0.59, p = 4.2 × 10-6) in the leg agility test.
Conclusion:
The video-based tracking could objectively measure limb bradykinesia in PD patients.
More Related Videos
08:45Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
Published on: March 28, 2018
07:26Characterizing the Relationship Between Eye Movement Parameters and Cognitive Functions in Non-demented Parkinson's Disease Patients with Eye Tracking
Published on: September 26, 2019