Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

X-ray Beam Induced Current Measurements for Multi-Modal X-ray Microscopy of Solar Cells
Published on: August 20, 2019
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing
Oliver L P Pickford Scienti1, Jeffrey C Bamber1, Dimitra G Darambara1
1Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UK.
Charge sharing effects (CSEs) in small pixels of photon counting detectors degrade performance. This study compares six charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) across various detector configurations, revealing performance differences and offering mechanistic explanations.
Area of Science:
- Photon counting detectors
- Semiconductor detector physics
- Image processing
Background:
- Modern energy-resolving photon counting detectors utilize small pixels for enhanced spatial resolution.
- Small pixels are susceptible to charge sharing effects (CSEs), which negatively impact spectral analysis and imaging quality.
- Existing charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) are often evaluated in isolation, limiting comparative performance analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively compare the performance of six different CSCAs against a no-correction baseline.
- To evaluate CSCA performance across a range of pixel pitches (100-600 µm) and photon fluxes (10^6-10^8 photons mm^-2 s^-1).
- To provide novel mechanistic insights into the differing efficacies of various CSCAs.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a combination of Monte Carlo simulations and finite element methods for analysis.
- Assessed performance based on four key metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency.
- Systematically varied detector pixel pitch and incident photon flux to simulate diverse operational conditions.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated significant performance variations among the six evaluated CSCAs.
- Quantified the impact of CSEs and the effectiveness of CSCAs across different pixel sizes and flux levels.
- Identified specific mechanistic reasons for the observed performance differences between CSCAs.
Conclusions:
- No single CSCA universally outperforms others across all tested conditions.
- The choice of CSCA significantly influences detector performance metrics, necessitating careful selection based on application requirements.
- This research provides a foundational comparison for optimizing CSCA implementation in photon counting detectors.
More Related Videos
06:49In situ Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering on Roll-To-Roll Coating of Organic Solar Cells with Laboratory X-ray Instrumentation
Published on: March 2, 2021
07:24Quantitative Atomic-Site Analysis of Functional Dopants/Point Defects in Crystalline Materials by Electron-Channeling-Enhanced Microanalysis
Published on: May 10, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
Determination of Crystal Structures