Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Do EXCEL and NOBLE translate into real world? A 5-year observational study of left main stem outcomes
1Cardiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK g.joy@nhs.net.
Insights
Medical management of left mainstem (LMS) disease yields poor outcomes. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) show comparable results, with PCI viable for selected LMS patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Left mainstem (LMS) disease is a critical condition requiring careful management.
- Treatment options include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and medical management.
- Real-world outcomes of these strategies need continuous evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the 5-year real-world outcomes of patients with significant left mainstem (LMS) disease.
- To compare outcomes between PCI, CABG, and medical management for LMS disease.
- To identify optimal treatment strategies for LMS disease.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 119 patients with LMS disease identified in 2012.
- Comparison of baseline characteristics and 5-year outcomes.
- Assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation, and all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- CABG was performed in 62%, PCI in 12%, and medical management in 26% of patients.
- PCI patients had higher rates of pre-treatment heart failure compared to CABG patients.
- Medical management was associated with significantly higher MACE (74% vs 25%) and all-cause mortality (52% vs 19%) compared to revascularisation (PCI or CABG).
Conclusions:
- Medical management of LMS disease is associated with poor outcomes, consistent with historical data.
- PCI remains a viable option for selected patients with LMS disease.
- Revascularisation strategies (PCI or CABG) offer superior outcomes compared to medical management for LMS disease.
Aims:
We aimed to uncover the 5-year real world outcomes of patients with significant left mainstem (LMS) disease managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or medical management.
Methods:
We identified patients with LMS disease in 2012 and analysed baseline characteristics and outcomes in the following 5 years.
Results:
119 patients were identified, 62% (74) received CABG and 12% (14) received PCI and 26% (31) were medically managed. In PCI versus CABG, there was no significant difference in age and Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score but there were significantly higher rates of pretreatment heart failure (ejection fraction 42%±10 vs 52%±13p=0.01). Overall major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) being a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation and all-cause mortality were not statistically different but numerically higher in the PCI group (36% (5) vs 23% (17) p=0.12). Medically managed patients were significantly older than those that were revascularised (PCI or CABG n=88; 75±11 vs 69±9 years p=0.01). They also had higher MACE (74% (23) vs 25% (22) p=0.000002) driven by MI (19% (6) vs 2% (1) p=0.01) and all-cause mortality (52% (16) vs 19% (17) p=0.01) compared with those with revascularisation.
Conclusions:
The bleak outcomes of medical management in LMS disease are reflective findings from studies performed from several decades ago. Our findings show that there is still a role for PCI in the management of LMS disease in selected patients.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests