Immunofluorescence tests for HIV antibody and their value as confirmatory tests

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is currently being used as a sensitive screening test for HIV antibody. The immunoblot assay (IBA) and indirect immunofluorescence (IF) techniques are two recommended confirmation tests for EIA-positive sera. An indirect IF test has been developed by various laboratories using acetone fixed mixtures of uninfected and HIV-infected cells, which facilitated the reading, since nonspecific reactions were easily differentiated from specific staining. Similar results have been obtained with H9-, CEM-, and HUT78-HIV-infected and uninfected cells. Anti-nuclear antibodies and auto-antibodies resulting in false-positive EIA results, could easily be differentiated by the IF test. Aspecific fluorescence can be removed by absorption of the specimens with non-infected cells. However, IF is not suitable for the screening of large series of specimens. IF is especially well suited for quantitative analysis of serum antibody levels. Whereas serum antibody titers rise initially after infection, they decrease as AIDS develops. Heat inactivation of sera did not affect reactivity in IF, in contrast to a high rate of false-positive results obtained with heat inactivated sera in some ELISAs. A well characterized serum from an AIDS patient can be used to perform IF in order to monitor HIV infection of susceptible cells. It has been claimed that titers of neutralizing antibodies significantly correlate with the levels of IF anti-HIV antibodies. An overall correlation of 99% between IF and IBA was reported by different laboratories, when HIV ELISA-reactive European and North American sera were tested. The concordance with IBA was 97% when HIV ELISA-reactive African sera were tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)