Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
Published on: October 8, 2015
RAS GTPase signalling to alternative effector pathways
Swati Singh1, Matthew J Smith1,2
1Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Abstract:
RAS GTPases are fundamental regulators of development and drivers of an extraordinary number of human cancers. RAS oncoproteins constitutively signal through downstream effector proteins, triggering cancer initiation, progression and metastasis. In the absence of targeted therapeutics to mutant RAS itself, inhibitors of downstream pathways controlled by the effector kinases RAF and PI3K have become tools in the treatment of RAS-driven tumours. Unfortunately, the efficacy of this approach has been greatly minimized by the prevalence of acquired drug resistance. Decades of research have established that RAS signalling is highly complex, and in addition to RAF and PI3K these small GTPase proteins can interact with an array of alternative effectors that feature RAS binding domains. The consequence of RAS binding to these effectors remains relatively unexplored, but these pathways may provide targets for combinatorial therapeutics. We discuss here three candidate alternative effectors: RALGEFs, RASSF5 and AFDN, detailing their interaction with RAS GTPases and their biological significance. The metastatic nature of RAS-driven cancers suggests more attention should be granted to these alternate pathways, as they are highly implicated in the regulation of cell adhesion, polarity, cell size and cytoskeletal architecture.
Insights
RAS GTPases drive cancer by signaling through effectors like RAF and PI3K. Exploring alternative RAS effectors, such as RALGEFs, RASSF5, and AFDN, may overcome drug resistance in cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Signaling
Background:
- RAS GTPases are crucial for cell development and are frequently mutated in human cancers.
- RAS oncoproteins promote cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis through constitutive downstream signaling.
- Current therapies targeting RAF and PI3K pathways are limited by acquired drug resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore alternative RAS effector pathways beyond RAF and PI3K.
- To investigate the biological significance of candidate alternative effectors: RALGEFs, RASSF5, and AFDN.
- To identify potential new therapeutic targets for RAS-driven cancers.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on RAS GTPase signaling and effector interactions.
- Analysis of the roles of RALGEFs, RASSF5, and AFDN in RAS-mediated cellular processes.
- Discussion of the implications for cancer therapy.
Main Results:
- RAS GTPases interact with a diverse range of alternative effectors.
- RALGEFs, RASSF5, and AFDN are identified as key alternative effectors with unexplored roles.
- These alternative pathways are implicated in cell adhesion, polarity, size, and cytoskeletal organization.
Conclusions:
- Alternative RAS effector pathways represent promising targets for overcoming drug resistance in RAS-driven cancers.
- Targeting RALGEFs, RASSF5, and AFDN could offer novel combinatorial therapeutic strategies.
- Further research into these pathways is warranted given their role in cancer metastasis.
More Related Videos
11:28Affinity Precipitation of Active Rho-GEFs Using a GST-tagged Mutant Rho Protein GST-RhoAG17A from Epithelial Cell Lysates
Published on: March 31, 2012
13:51Detection of Small GTPase Prenylation and GTP Binding Using Membrane Fractionation and GTPase-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Published on: November 11, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
Activation and Inactivation of G Proteins
GTPases and their Regulation
Large G-proteins,...
GTPases and their Regulation
Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...