Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 3, 2025

Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
Physiologically variable ventilation reduces regional lung inflammation in a pediatric model of acute respiratory
Andre Dos Santos Rocha1, Gergely H Fodor2,3, Miklos Kassai2
1Unit for Anaesthesiological Investigations, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva and University of Geneva, rue Willy Donzé 6, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. Andre.DosSantosRocha@unige.ch.
Insights
Physiological variable ventilation (PVV) reduced lung inflammation in juvenile rabbits compared to conventional pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). This study highlights PVV's potential benefits for pediatric respiratory support.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Respiratory physiology
- Inflammation research
Background:
- Variable mechanical ventilation (VMV) offers benefits for lung health, but its effects in pediatric models and on regional inflammation are not well-established.
- Previous studies suggest VMV may improve outcomes, yet its impact on regional lung inflammation requires further investigation, particularly in young patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of physiological variable ventilation (PVV) versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on regional lung inflammation.
- To evaluate structural, molecular, and functional outcomes related to inflammation in a pediatric model of healthy lungs and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Main Methods:
- Utilized 36 New-Zealand White rabbit pups with healthy lungs or induced ARDS, randomized to 5 hours of PCV or PVV.
- Assessed regional lung aeration, inflammation (using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake), and perfusion via CT, PET, and SPECT scans.
- Monitored ventilation parameters, blood gases, and respiratory tissue elastance hourly.
Main Results:
- PVV improved respiratory elastance in both healthy and ARDS rabbit pups compared to PCV.
- PVV significantly reduced lung inflammation, indicated by lower normalized [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, especially in well and poorly aerated zones.
- No significant benefits of PVV were observed for regional blood perfusion or blood gas parameters.
Conclusions:
- Physiological variable ventilation (PVV) effectively reduces both global and regional lung inflammation in juvenile rabbits.
- PVV demonstrates a potential advantage over conventional pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in managing lung inflammation in pediatric patients.
- These findings support further research into PVV for pediatric respiratory support, particularly in ARDS cases.
Background:
Benefits of variable mechanical ventilation based on the physiological breathing pattern have been observed both in healthy and injured lungs. These benefits have not been characterized in pediatric models and the effect of this ventilation mode on regional distribution of lung inflammation also remains controversial. Here, we compare structural, molecular and functional outcomes reflecting regional inflammation between PVV and conventional pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in a pediatric model of healthy lungs and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Methods:
New-Zealand White rabbit pups (n = 36, 670 ± 20 g [half-width 95% confidence interval]), with healthy lungs or after induction of ARDS, were randomized to five hours of mechanical ventilation with PCV or PVV. Regional lung aeration, inflammation and perfusion were assessed using x-ray computed tomography, positron-emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography, respectively. Ventilation parameters, blood gases and respiratory tissue elastance were recorded hourly.
Results:
Mechanical ventilation worsened respiratory elastance in healthy and ARDS animals ventilated with PCV (11 ± 8%, 6 ± 3%, p < 0.04), however, this trend was improved by PVV (1 ± 4%, - 6 ± 2%). Animals receiving PVV presented reduced inflammation as assessed by lung normalized [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in healthy (1.49 ± 0.62 standardized uptake value, SUV) and ARDS animals (1.86 ± 0.47 SUV) compared to PCV (2.33 ± 0.775 and 2.28 ± 0.3 SUV, respectively, p < 0.05), particularly in the well and poorly aerated lung zones. No benefit of PVV could be detected on regional blood perfusion or blood gas parameters.
Conclusions:
Variable ventilation based on a physiological respiratory pattern, compared to conventional pressure-controlled ventilation, reduced global and regional inflammation in both healthy and injured lungs of juvenile rabbits.
More Related Videos
09:36Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
08:58Development of a Neonatal Piglet Acute Lung Injury Model Recreating the Early Environment of Preterm Infant Lungs
Published on: October 31, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Pulmonary Cycle: Exhalation
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...