Laboratory diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

T Gulholm1, K Basile2, J Kok3

  • 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

Pathology
|November 2, 2020
PubMed

Insights

This article reviews laboratory diagnostic methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing COVID-19. It details nucleic acid, serology, and antigen tests, discussing their pros, cons, and use in Australia.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The first COVID-19 case in Australia was confirmed on 25 January 2020.
  • The Australian Government activated emergency response plans anticipating a pandemic.
  • The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern and then a pandemic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of current laboratory diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2.
  • To present the advantages and disadvantages of different diagnostic tests.
  • To describe the challenges in providing SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics in Australia.

Main Methods:

  • Nucleic acid testing (NAT)
  • Serology and antibody tests
  • Rapid antigen detection tests
  • Virus isolation
  • Whole genome sequencing

Main Results:

  • The article presents a comparative analysis of various diagnostic methods.
  • It evaluates the utility of each test in clinical, infection control, and public health settings.
  • Challenges specific to Australia's low-incidence, potentially changing COVID-19 landscape are discussed.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for effective public health interventions like contact tracing and isolation.
  • Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different diagnostic approaches is vital for optimal use.
  • Adapting diagnostic strategies to Australia's specific epidemiological context is essential for pandemic management.