Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lysozyme revisited: evaluating models of a reference protein in structural biology.

Current research in structural biology·2026
Same author

Twelve-Month Outcome of Nasolabial Fold Correction by a Novel Non-1,4-Butanediol Diglycidyl Ether, Click-Crosslinked, Long-Chain Hyaluronic Acid Product.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology·2026
Same author

Managing healthcare for female BRCA carriers in the population screening era: developing a harmonized national policy for surveillance and risk-reduction.

Israel journal of health policy research·2026
Same author

How to mitigate the caveat emptor burden of human and machine users of the Protein Data Bank.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2026
Same author

Enhancing structural insights for advanced drug discovery by mitigating protein crystal damage.

Expert opinion on drug discovery·2025
Same author

Does Size Matter? Exploring the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix Dimensions on Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2025
Same journal

Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Hospital Experience in Rwanda.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Do Dedicated Research Years Matter? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery Program Leadership.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Longevity and Volume Expansion of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Cross-sectional 3-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Computed Tomographic Angiography-guided Zero-CO<sub>2</sub> Endoscopic Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap for Salvage Breast Reconstruction After Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Loss.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Juvenile Hyaline Fibromatosis Presenting as Progressive Flexion Contracture of the Middle Finger in a Child: A Case Report.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same journal

Plant Exosome Injection with or without Low Level Laser Therapy Promotes Skin Wound Healing: An Experimental Study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

3.6K

Mastectomy Incision Design to Optimize Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction.

Adi Maisel Lotan1,2, Krystina C Tongson3, Alice M Police4

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, N.Y.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|November 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mastectomy incision design significantly impacts breast reconstruction aesthetics. Hidden scar techniques, often used in cosmetic surgery, provide the most aesthetically pleasing results, with vertical scars outperforming transverse ones.

More Related Videos

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

528
Orthotopic Transplantation of Breast Tumors as Preclinical Models for Breast Cancer
07:45

Orthotopic Transplantation of Breast Tumors as Preclinical Models for Breast Cancer

Published on: May 18, 2020

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

3.6K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

528
Orthotopic Transplantation of Breast Tumors as Preclinical Models for Breast Cancer
07:45

Orthotopic Transplantation of Breast Tumors as Preclinical Models for Breast Cancer

Published on: May 18, 2020

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Oncologic Surgery
  • Breast Reconstruction

Background:

  • Optimal mastectomy incision choice balances oncologic, reconstructive, and aesthetic factors.
  • Key considerations include nipple preservation, skin margins, perfusion, excess skin, prior scars, and reconstruction plan.
  • New scar placement aims for inconspicuousness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess how mastectomy incision design influences the aesthetic outcomes of breast reconstruction.
  • Evaluate the aesthetic impact of different mastectomy incision patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Nine mastectomy incision patterns were categorized into hidden, vertical, and transverse scar groups.
  • Twenty plastic surgeons blindly graded pre- and post-reconstruction breast photos.
  • Grading focused on scar visibility, position, and overall aesthetic influence.

Main Results:

  • Statistically significant differences in aesthetic outcomes were observed among incision groups.
  • Hidden incisions resulted in the most aesthetically pleasing outcomes.
  • Vertical scars were rated as more favorable than transverse scars; symmetry is crucial for bilateral cases.

Conclusions:

  • Mastectomy incision pattern is a significant determinant of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction.
  • Incision patterns adapted from cosmetic breast surgery yield superior aesthetic outcomes.
  • Surgeons must integrate oncologic factors and patient specifics when selecting the ideal mastectomy incision.