Reconstruction of Full-thickness Soft Tissue Defects with Integra: Risk Factors and Treatment Algorithm

Despite the fact that dermal substitutes are widely used in reconstructive surgery, there have been no studies focused on predictors of complications or delayed matrix take. We propose an algorithm for management of soft tissue reconstruction with Integra dermal matrix, based on our 5-year-long clinical experience.

An estimated 111 patients who underwent Integra reconstruction of full-thickness soft tissue defects of different anatomical sites and etiology were enrolled, and dichotomized in two groups according to complications. Participants were further studied according to the wound healing strategy: healing by secondary intention, skin graft (STSG), and flap surgery. A regression analysis was conducted in the whole sample to identify possible predictors of complications.

No significant differences according to complications were observed. The between-group statistical analysis showed significant differences in age, comorbidities, defect area, diagnosis, and defect site. The regression analysis revealed that the timing of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) was not influenced by age, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), defect area, site, wound etiology, and risk factors in the subjects who underwent a two-step reconstruction. Healing by secondary intention is recommended for small post-oncological defects of the head, especially in elderly and multimorbid patients. Variables that may interfere with dermal substitutes' incorporation are independent of the timing of STSG placement; therefore, no predictors of complications or delayed matrix take were identified.

Our findings showed that Integra can be used in a wide range of patients regardless of their general features, thus acting as a useful alternative to conventional reconstructive techniques in selected cases.