Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

05:45
Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example
Published on: March 11, 2020
9.2K
Measuring reproducibility of virus metagenomics analyses using bootstrap samples from FASTQ-files
Babak Saremi1, Moritz Kohls1, Pamela Liebig1
1Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover D-30559, Germany.
Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|November 2, 2020
Summary
Technical errors in high-throughput sequencing can lead to false virus identification. Our bootstrap resampling method and mixture model assess analysis robustness and identify potential false positives in virus metagenomics data.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Genomics
- Virology
Background:
- High-throughput sequencing (HTS) data are susceptible to technical errors affecting experimental reproducibility.
- In virus metagenomics, these errors can lead to the misidentification of viruses, impacting study accuracy.
- Assessing the robustness of HTS data analysis is crucial for reliable scientific conclusions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel bootstrap resampling approach for generating artificial replicates of sequencing runs.
- To evaluate a mixture model for identifying potentially false positive findings based on virus read counts.
- To enhance the reliability and reproducibility of virus metagenomics analyses.
Main Methods:
- Developed a resampling approach using bootstrap sampling of sequencing reads from FASTQ files.
- Applied a mixture model to the distribution of read counts per virus.
- Evaluated the methods on both simulated and real-world virus metagenomics datasets.
Main Results:
- The bootstrap resampling approach demonstrated high reproducibility in virus detection, with strong correlation between original and bootstrap read counts.
- Bootstrap read counts effectively indicated variations in the evidence for virus presence.
- The mixture model showed good fit to read count distributions and improved accuracy in identifying true positives.
Conclusions:
- The proposed bootstrap resampling method and mixture model are effective tools for assessing the robustness of virus metagenomics analyses.
- These methods aid in identifying potential false positive findings and improving the reliability of virus detection.
- The RESEQ tool facilitates the practical application of bootstrap read generation for robust bioinformatics analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Bootstrapping
734
The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is...
734
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
18.4K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.4K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
14.7K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
14.7K

