Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Risk stratification and secondary prevention post-myocardial infarction: insights from the EYESHOT Post-MI study
Furio Colivicchi1, Stefania Angela Di Fusco1, Michele Massimo Gulizia2,3
1Clinical and Rehabilitative Cardiology Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital ASL Roma1, Rome.
Insights
Managing patients after myocardial infarction (MI) is complex. This study found that higher-risk patients, identified by specific features, had more severe conditions but received inadequate secondary prevention therapies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Clinical management of patients over one year post-myocardial infarction (MI) presents significant challenges.
- Effective patient risk stratification is crucial for prioritizing therapeutic interventions after MI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively describe the risk profile of patients with a history of MI.
- To evaluate the management strategies employed in patients with prior MI.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the EYESHOT Post-MI study (1-3 years post-MI).
- Risk stratification using PEGASUS-TIMI 54 high-risk features: diabetes, recurrent MI, multivessel disease, CKD, age ≥65.
- Patients categorized into subgroups based on the number of high-risk features (0, 1, 2, 3, >3).
Main Results:
- 1008 of 1633 patients were stratified; 22% had no high-risk features, 25% had ≥3.
- Clinical severity indicators increased with the number of high-risk features.
- Dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation use increased with risk, while lipid-lowering therapies (statins, ezetimibe) decreased.
Conclusions:
- Higher-risk post-MI patients, identified by PEGASUS-TIMI 54 criteria, exhibit greater clinical severity.
- Secondary prevention therapies were inadequately implemented in these higher-risk post-MI individuals.
Aims:
Clinical management of patients more than 1 year after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is challenging. Patient risk stratification may help to establish therapeutic priorities. We aimed to describe the comprehensive risk profile and management of patients with prior MI.
Methods:
We analyzed data from the EYESHOT Post-MI study, which evaluated the management of patients 1-3 years after MI. The risk profile of participants was defined according to the qualifying high-risk features of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial (history of diabetes, history of recurrent MI, angiographic evidence of multivessel coronary disease, chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min, age ≥65 years). Patients were classified into five subgroups according to the presence of zero, one, two, three, or more than three features.
Results:
Of the 1633 patients in the EYESHOT Post-MI study, 1008 could be stratified according to PEGASUS-TIMI 54 high-risk features. About 22% of patients had no high-risk features, whereas 25% showed at least three features. The prevalence of patients with specific clinical severity indicators was progressively higher with the increasing number of high-risk features. Dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation were more frequently used in patients with an increasing number of high-risk features (P for trend <0.0001). Lipid-lowering therapies were less frequently prescribed in patients with a higher number of features (P for trend 0.006 for statins; P for trend 0.007 for ezetimibe).
Conclusion:
Higher-risk post-MI patients, identified by PEGASUS-TIMI 54 high-risk features, showed an increased prevalence of major clinical severity indicators. Secondary prevention therapies were not adequately implemented in higher-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management

