Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

44.7K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
44.7K
Muscles for Facial Expressions01:14

Muscles for Facial Expressions

4.1K
The craniofacial muscles are a collection of approximately 20 thin skeletal muscles situated beneath the skin of the face and scalp. These muscles, primarily responsible for the vast array of human facial expressions, originate from the bones or fibrous structures of the skull and extend outwards to connect with the skin. While most skeletal muscles in the body are enveloped in thick fascia, facial muscles generally have a more delicate fascial covering, with the buccinator muscle being a...
4.1K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

430
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
430
Signs of Puberty01:27

Signs of Puberty

1.0K
Puberty is a critical phase, typically beginning between the ages of 8 and 13 in girls and 9 and 14 in boys, though timing can vary based on genetics, environmental factors, and overall health. This period is characterized by the development of secondary sexual characteristics and the attainment of reproductive potential. Endocrine changes underpin puberty, with hormonal surges of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) instigated by Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)...
1.0K
Overview of the Skull01:08

Overview of the Skull

6.9K
The cranium (skull) is the skeletal structure of the head that supports the face and protects the brain. It is subdivided into the facial bones and the brain case, or cranial vault. The facial bones underlie the facial structures, form the nasal cavity, enclose the eyeballs, and support the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
6.9K
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles01:30

Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles

1.4K
A thorough assessment of respiratory health is paramount in clinical settings to identify and manage respiratory distress and ensure adequate oxygenation. This article elaborates on the critical aspects of respiratory evaluation, including airway assessment, skin color examination, and the observation of accessory muscle use, which are integral to effectively diagnosing and managing patients with respiratory conditions.
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Facial Hypertrophy as a Complication of Weight Gain in Autologous Fat Graft Patients: Considerations and Recommendations.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2023
Same author

Use of Minimally Invasive Radiofrequency-Assisted Lipolysis as a Novel Treatment of Grade 2 and Grade 3 Cellulite.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2023
Same author

Commentary on: Effect of Positional Changes on Skin Landmarks in Midface Filling.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2022
Same author

Orbital Aging: A Computed Tomography-Based Study of 240 Orbits.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2022
Same author

Commentary on: The Concept of Ideal Caucasian Male Lips: An Anthropometric Analysis of the Lower Third of the Face.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2022
Same author

Reply: Use of Doppler Ultrasound to Avoid Injection Complications.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2020
Same journal

Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

"Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.1K

Facial Shape, Size, and Gender.

Val Lambros1, Gideon Amos1

  • 1From the University of California, Irvine; and Canfield Scientific.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|November 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study analyzed facial architecture by comparing male and female averages, controlling for size. Findings reveal intrinsic shape differences, not just size, define facial distinctions.

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.5K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.1K
Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures
05:33

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

7.5K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Anthropometry
  • Facial morphology
  • Computer vision

Background:

  • Traditional facial sex dimorphism studies rely on limited exemplars.
  • Existing methods often conflate shape and size variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To isolate the impact of intrinsic facial shape on sex differences.
  • To provide a more objective visualization of male and female facial architecture.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized average male and female facial models.
  • Equalized model sizes to isolate shape variations.
  • Employed quantitative facial analysis techniques.

Main Results:

  • Identified distinct intrinsic shape differences between male and female facial averages.
  • Demonstrated that shape, independent of size, contributes significantly to perceived facial sex differences.
  • Quantified architectural variations in key facial regions.

Conclusions:

  • Intrinsic facial shape is a primary determinant of sex differences in facial architecture.
  • This method offers a more nuanced understanding beyond traditional, often biased, visualizations.
  • Provides a foundation for further research in facial anthropometry and computer-aided facial analysis.