Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Validation of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS)
Yannik Terhorst1,2, Paula Philippi2, Lasse B Sander3
1Department of Research Methods, Institute of Psychology and Education, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) effectively assesses mobile health app quality, demonstrating good reliability and objectivity. This validated tool can enhance transparency for patients and healthcare providers regarding app quality.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Digital Health
- Mobile Health Applications
Background:
- The rapid growth of the mobile health app (MHA) market necessitates robust tools for assessing app content and quality.
- Existing assessment instruments for MHAs require further validation, particularly concerning their metric properties.
- The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) is widely used but lacks comprehensive validation of its construct and concurrent validity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the construct validity, concurrent validity, reliability, and objectivity of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).
- To confirm the metric quality of MARS for assessing mobile health applications.
Main Methods:
- Pooled data from 15 international app quality reviews involving 1,299 MHAs across 15 health domains.
- Construct validity assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with various fit indices (RMSEA, CFI, TLI, SRMR).
- Concurrent validity examined by correlating MARS scores with the ENLIGHT tool; reliability via Omega; objectivity via intra-class correlation (ICC).
Main Results:
- Confirmatory factor analysis supported a bifactor model for MARS (RMSEA=0.074, TLI=0.922, CFI=0.940, SRMR=0.059).
- MARS demonstrated good to excellent reliability (Omega=0.79–0.93) and high objectivity (ICC=0.82).
- MARS showed significant correlations with ENLIGHT, supporting its concurrent validity (p<.05).
Conclusions:
- The metric evaluation confirms MARS's suitability for assessing mobile health app quality.
- MARS can enhance transparency regarding MHA quality for healthcare stakeholders and patients.
- Future research should investigate MARS's re-test reliability and predictive validity.
Related Concept Videos
Conversion of Units
The first step in the unit conversion is to list the given units and the units required...
Stereotype Content Model
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Field Application of Global Positioning System

