Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.8K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

64.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.1K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

63.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
63.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

978
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
978
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

275
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
275

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fragmentation and multithreading of experience in the default-mode network.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Seeking New Information With Old Questions: Children and Adults Reuse and Recombine Concepts From Prior Questions.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2025
Same author

Correction: A Comprehensive Behavioral Dataset for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

A Comprehensive Behavioral Dataset for the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Rational causal induction from events in time.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

A timeline of cognitive costs in decision-making.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Retributive Sentiments Track Both Deterrent and Compensatory Concerns in a Small-Scale Society and a WEIRD Sample.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K

Broken Physics: A Conjunction-Fallacy Effect in Intuitive Physical Reasoning.

Ethan Ludwin-Peery1, Neil R Bramley2, Ernest Davis3

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University.

Psychological Science
|November 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People make logical errors in intuitive physics, rating combined events as more likely than single events. This finding challenges current theories of mental simulation in physical reasoning.

Keywords:
inferenceintuitive physicsopen dataopen materialspredictionpreregisteredreasoning

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Physics

Background:

  • Human cognition allows reasoning about physical events.
  • Intuitive physics understanding is crucial for daily life.
  • The conjunction fallacy is a known cognitive bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if intuitive physics reasoning is susceptible to the conjunction fallacy.
  • To provide novel evidence for conjunction errors in physical event probability judgments.
  • To challenge existing theories of mental simulation in physics.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed videos of physical scenarios.
  • Judged the probability of single events versus conjunctions of events.
  • Three experiments (N=340 total) tested reliability and generalizability.

Main Results:

  • Participants consistently rated conjunction events as more probable than single constituent events.
  • Results held across different scenarios and after ruling out alternative explanations.
  • Conjunction errors were reliably observed in intuitive physics judgments.

Conclusions:

  • Intuitive physics reasoning is subject to the conjunction fallacy.
  • This contradicts previous assumptions that such errors are absent in this domain.
  • Findings pose a significant challenge to current mental simulation theories.