Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

09:48
Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
Published on: September 11, 2017
10.2K
Does focus of attention alter craniocervical flexion test motor learning? A randomized controlled trial
Maurício Scholl Schell1, Francisco Xavier de Araujo2, Rosicler da Rosa Almeida3
1Physical Therapy Department, Post Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Human Movement Science
|November 2, 2020
Summary
Mixed focus improved craniocervical flexion test performance in inexperienced individuals, outperforming internal and external focus. These benefits persisted after one week, though muscle activity and range of motion were unaffected.
Area of Science:
- Motor learning research
- Sports science
- Rehabilitation
Background:
- Focus of attention significantly influences motor skill acquisition.
- Internal focus directs attention to body movements, while external focus directs attention to the outcome of movements.
- Understanding attentional focus is crucial for optimizing motor learning strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of internal, external, and mixed foci of attention on motor learning of the craniocervical flexion test.
- To assess the effects on muscle activity, range of motion, and test performance in novice participants.
Main Methods:
- Ninety healthy young adults with no prior experience performed the craniocervical flexion test.
- Participants were divided into three groups: Mixed Focus (internal + external), Internal Focus, and External Focus.
- Motor learning was evaluated by measuring superficial cervical flexor muscle activity, craniocervical range of motion, and test performance immediately, post-training, and at retention (one week).
Main Results:
- No significant changes were observed in superficial neck flexor muscle activity or craniocervical range of motion across all groups and time points.
- Mixed focus demonstrated superior craniocervical flexion test performance compared to both external and internal focus immediately post-training and at retention.
- External focus showed better performance than internal focus at all assessment points.
Conclusions:
- Attentional focus (internal, external, mixed) did not alter cervical muscle activity or range of motion in novice craniocervical flexion test participants.
- Mixed focus proved most effective for improving craniocervical flexion test performance, with benefits sustained over a one-week retention period.
Keywords:
BiofeedbackCraniocervical flexion testFocus of attentionMotor controlMotor learningPressure biofeedback
