Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

430
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
430
Muscles for Facial Expressions01:14

Muscles for Facial Expressions

4.1K
The craniofacial muscles are a collection of approximately 20 thin skeletal muscles situated beneath the skin of the face and scalp. These muscles, primarily responsible for the vast array of human facial expressions, originate from the bones or fibrous structures of the skull and extend outwards to connect with the skin. While most skeletal muscles in the body are enveloped in thick fascia, facial muscles generally have a more delicate fascial covering, with the buccinator muscle being a...
4.1K
Therapeutic Communication01:30

Therapeutic Communication

6.6K
Communication is a lifelong learning process. Through therapeutic communication, nurses can collect relevant assessment data, provide education and counseling, and interact during nursing interventions. Sending and receiving messages occur through verbal and nonverbal communication techniques and can happen separately or simultaneously.
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
6.6K
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

8.0K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
8.0K
Aggression01:47

Aggression

29.8K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
29.8K
Accessory Structures of the Eye01:17

Accessory Structures of the Eye

3.0K
Optical perception, or vision, is an extraordinary sense dependent on converting light signals received via the ocular organs. These organs, known as eyes, are securely positioned within the bony cavities of the skull, called orbits. The orbits serve a dual purpose: a protective shield for the ocular globes and a stable attachment point for the soft ocular tissues. The eye's external protective mechanisms include the eyelids, which are edged with lashes that act as a barrier against foreign...
3.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cortical plasticity of the tactile mirror system in borderline personality disorder.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Enhanced laser frequency stabilization to a high-finesse cavity through a combined feed-back and feed-forward correction.

Optics express·2025
Same author

The role of task relevance in saccadic responses to facial expressions.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2024
Same author

The power of null findings.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Neural Filtering of Physiological Tremor Oscillations to Spinal Motor Neurons Mediates Short-Term Acquisition of a Skill Learning Task.

eNeuro·2024
Same author

Hydroxychloroquine Dose and Hospitalizations for Active Lupus.

Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.5K

Threatening Facial Expressions Impact Goal-Directed Actions Only if Task-Relevant.

Christian Mancini1, Luca Falciati1, Claudio Maioli1

  • 1Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123 Brescia (BS), Italy.

Brain Sciences
|November 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Facial expressions impact action planning, but only when relevant to the task. Angry and fearful faces decrease response readiness, with anger having a stronger effect than fear.

Keywords:
Go/No-go taskdecision makingemotionfacial expressionsmotor readiness

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.2K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.5K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.2K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Facial emotional expressions are crucial for nonverbal social interactions.
  • The influence of threatening facial expressions (anger, fear) on action planning remains debated.
  • Anger and fear, though both negative, signal different social threats.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the context-dependent effects of facial emotions on action planning and execution.
  • To differentiate the impact of angry versus fearful faces on motor responses.
  • To understand the cognitive resources required for processing threatening facial expressions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a novel Go/No-go task with emotional and control versions.
  • Participants performed or withheld movements in response to fearful, angry, happy, or neutral faces.
  • A control task used facial gender to direct movement, isolating emotion's effect.

Main Results:

  • Emotional facial expressions interfered with actions only when task-relevant, demonstrating context-dependency.
  • Both angry and fearful faces reduced response readiness compared to happy faces.
  • Angry faces significantly increased error rates and movement execution time more than fearful faces.

Conclusions:

  • The impact of facial emotions on action is context-dependent.
  • Threatening facial expressions, particularly anger, demand greater cognitive resources for appraisal before action.
  • Distinguishing between anger and fear is critical for understanding their distinct effects on behavior.