Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Domineering Dispositions and Hierarchy Preferences: Differentiating the Impact of Traits and Social Values in
Robin Bergh1,2, Jim Sidanius1
1Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Abstract:
In this article, we examined the relation between valuing hierarchies (dominant value orientations) and personally wanting to get ahead, without regard for others' welfare (domineering dispositions). Survey data from five studies (total N > 1,500) indicated differences between being domineering and endorsing dominant value orientations. This distinction was also evident in different strategies in economic games. Domineering individuals typically gave less to a powerless player (dictator game) but changed behaviors when the other party possessed bargaining power (ultimatum game). Individuals endorsing dominant value orientations did not show such "exploitative opportunism." In a third-party punishment task, in contrast, individuals with dominant value orientations were more likely to intervene against fair decisions (i.e., upholding inequalities between others). Correcting behaviors of others were not predicted by domineering dispositions. We discuss implications for distinguishing between traits and social values more broadly.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Desirable Characteristics in Others
Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits
Trait Centrality
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Impact of Groups on Groups

