Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

The Treadmill Fatigue Test: A Simple, High-throughput Assay of Fatigue-like Behavior for the Mouse
Published on: May 31, 2016
Cancer-related fatigue: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mind-body intervention
1Nursing Department, Fatima College of Health Science, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mind-body interventions (MBIs) for the management of cancer-related fatigue.
Methods:
A comprehensive search on multiple databases was conducted to identify relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from January 2008 to December 2019. Two authors independently selected reviews, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of included reviews using Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).
Results:
Sixteen reviews published between 2010 and 2018 were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the 16 included systematic reviews was moderate (score 4-7) to high (score ≥ 8) on the 11-point AMSTAR scale. The most common methodological weaknesses were the lack of a list of excluded studies (n = 15, 93.8%) and a priori protocol (n = 2,87.5%). Furthermore, most of the systematic reviews did not search the gray literature for eligible studies (n = 13, 81.3%).
Significance Of The Study:
This study has revealed the need for high methodological quality systematic reviews on the MBIs for the management of cancer-related fatigue. Thus, further research should focus on methodologically strong systematic reviews by providing a priori design, not limiting the publication type, and providing an excluded primary studies list. Additionally, the researchers should conduct systematic reviews according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline.
Insights
This study assessed the quality of systematic reviews on mind-body interventions for cancer fatigue. Most reviews had methodological weaknesses, highlighting the need for stronger research practices and adherence to reporting guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Systematic Reviews
Background:
- Cancer-related fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom.
- Mind-body interventions (MBIs) show promise for managing cancer-related fatigue.
- The methodological quality of existing systematic reviews on MBIs for cancer fatigue needs evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on mind-body interventions for cancer-related fatigue.
- To identify common methodological weaknesses in these reviews.
- To provide recommendations for improving the quality of future systematic reviews.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between January 2008 and December 2019.
- Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool.
- Sixteen systematic reviews were included in the final analysis.
Main Results:
- The methodological quality of the 16 included systematic reviews ranged from moderate to high on the 11-point AMSTAR scale.
- Common weaknesses included the absence of a list of excluded studies (93.8%) and a priori protocols (87.5%).
- A significant majority of reviews (81.3%) did not search the gray literature.
Conclusions:
- There is a need for higher methodological quality in systematic reviews addressing mind-body interventions for cancer-related fatigue.
- Future systematic reviews should incorporate a priori designs, include a list of excluded studies, and consider gray literature.
- Adherence to guidelines like the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Psychoneuroimmunology: Diabetes and Cancer

