Cancer-related fatigue: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mind-body intervention

Huda Anshasi1, Muayyad Ahmad2

  • 1Nursing Department, Fatima College of Health Science, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Abstract

Insights

This study assessed the quality of systematic reviews on mind-body interventions for cancer fatigue. Most reviews had methodological weaknesses, highlighting the need for stronger research practices and adherence to reporting guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Systematic Reviews

Background:

  • Cancer-related fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom.
  • Mind-body interventions (MBIs) show promise for managing cancer-related fatigue.
  • The methodological quality of existing systematic reviews on MBIs for cancer fatigue needs evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on mind-body interventions for cancer-related fatigue.
  • To identify common methodological weaknesses in these reviews.
  • To provide recommendations for improving the quality of future systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between January 2008 and December 2019.
  • Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool.
  • Sixteen systematic reviews were included in the final analysis.

Main Results:

  • The methodological quality of the 16 included systematic reviews ranged from moderate to high on the 11-point AMSTAR scale.
  • Common weaknesses included the absence of a list of excluded studies (93.8%) and a priori protocols (87.5%).
  • A significant majority of reviews (81.3%) did not search the gray literature.

Conclusions:

  • There is a need for higher methodological quality in systematic reviews addressing mind-body interventions for cancer-related fatigue.
  • Future systematic reviews should incorporate a priori designs, include a list of excluded studies, and consider gray literature.
  • Adherence to guidelines like the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is recommended.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Therapies02:49

Cancer Therapies

Cancer therapies are various modes of treatment, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy that are administered to cancer patients.
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
9.4K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
551
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.6K
Psychoneuroimmunology: Diabetes and Cancer01:19

Psychoneuroimmunology: Diabetes and Cancer

Chronic stress has been linked to both the onset and progression of serious health conditions, including Type 2 diabetes and cancer. Type 2 diabetes, a widespread chronic illness, is closely associated with obesity and insulin resistance, both of which often worsen under stress. Studies indicate that men experiencing high levels of chronic stress face a 45% higher risk of developing diabetes compared to those with minimal stress. Stress triggers physiological responses that elevate blood...
253