Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
Published on: March 6, 2019
Joint Generalized Coherence Factor and Minimum Variance Beamformer for Synthetic Aperture Ultrasound Imaging
Abstract:
The delay-and-sum (DAS) beamformer is the most commonly used method in medical ultrasound imaging. Compared with the DAS beamformer, the minimum variance (MV) beamformer has an excellent ability to improve lateral resolution by minimizing the output of interference and noise power. However, it is hard to overcome the tradeoff between satisfactory lateral resolution and speckle preservation performance due to the fixed subarray length of covariance matrix estimation. In this study, a new approach for MV beamforming with adaptive spatial smoothing is developed to address this problem. In the new approach, the generalized coherence factor (GCF) is used as a local coherence detection tool to adaptively determine the subarray length for spatial smoothing, which is called adaptive spatial-smoothed MV (AMV). Furthermore, another adaptive regional weighting strategy based on the local signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and GCF is devised for AMV to enhance the image contrast, which is called GCF regional weighted AMV (GAMV). To evaluate the performance of the proposed methods, we compare them with the standard MV by conducting the simulation, in vitro experiment, and the in vivo rat mammary tumor study. The results show that the proposed methods outperform MV in speckle preservation without an appreciable loss in lateral resolution. Moreover, GAMV offers excellent performance in image contrast. In particular, AMV can achieve maximal improvements of speckle signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by 96.19% (simulation) and 62.82% (in vitro) compared with MV. GAMV achieves improvements of contrast-to-noise ratio by 27.16% (simulation) and 47.47% (in vitro) compared with GCF. Meanwhile, the losses in lateral resolution of AMV are 0.01 mm (simulation) and 0.17 mm (in vitro) compared with MV. Overall, this indicates that the proposed methods can effectively address the inherent limitation of the standard MV in order to improve the image quality.
More Related Videos
16:01An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging
Published on: September 24, 2017
09:02Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
Published on: January 31, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length,...