Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 2, 2025

An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
Published on: February 17, 2018
First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis After Failed Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus
Maria Tiscar Garcia-Ortiz1, Jose Juan Talavera-Gosalbez1, Lorena Moril-Peñalver1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elche University Hospital, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes after first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis for hallux rigidus between patients who underwent primary arthrodesis and those who had had a prior surgery for hallux valgus.
Methods:
Our design was a retrospective cohort study comparing 29 patients who underwent primary arthrodesis (primary group) and 34 patients with hallux rigidus after hallux valgus surgery (secondary group). The clinical assessment included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Radiological evaluation was also performed. Overall, the mean postoperative follow-up was 3.4 (range, 2-5) years.
Results:
At final follow-up, AOFAS and VAS pain scores significantly improved in both groups (P = .001). However, the mean AOFAS (P = .001) and VAS pain (P = .008) scores were significantly better in the primary group than in the secondary group. Radiologically, there were no significant differences between the groups in any angle after arthrodesis. Revision surgeries were not required in the primary group. In the secondary group, there was 1 revision due to deep infection, and 3 other patients required dorsal plate removal. Excluding plate removal, the Kaplan-Meier survival at 3 years was not significantly different between groups (P = .775).
Conclusion:
Although arthrodesis of the first MTP joint was an effective procedure for hallux rigidus, the clinical outcomes in patients who had prior hallux valgus surgery were worse than those for patients who underwent primary surgery for hallux rigidus.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, retrospective cohort study.

